Scene Context Influences Without Scene Gist: Eye Movements Guided by Spatial Associations in Visual Search

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2011 May 21

PMID 21598055

Citations 33

Authors

Monica S Castelhano

Chelsea Heaven

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although the use of semantic information about the world seems ubiquitous in every task we perform, it is not clear whether we rely on a scene's semantic information to guide attention when searching for something in a specific scene context (e.g., keys in one's living room). To address this question, we compared contribution of a scene's semantic information (i.e., scene gist) versus learned spatial associations between objects and context. Using the flash-preview-moving-window paradigm Castelhano and Henderson (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33:753-763, 2007), participants searched for target objects that were placed in either consistent or inconsistent locations and were semantically consistent or inconsistent with the scene gist. The results showed that learned spatial associations were used to guide search even in inconsistent contexts, providing evidence that scene context can affect search performance without consistent scene gist information. We discuss the results in terms of hierarchical organization of top-down influences of scene context.

Citing Articles

Eye movements reflect active statistical learning.

Arato J, Rothkopf C, Fiser J J Vis. 2024; 24(5):17.

PMID: 38819805 PMC: 11146064. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.5.17.

Visual search for reach targets in actionable space is influenced by movement costs imposed by obstacles.

Moskowitz J, Fooken J, Castelhano M, Gallivan J, Flanagan J J Vis. 2023; 23(6):4.

PMID: 37289172 PMC: 10257340. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.6.4.

Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.

Wolfe J, Horowitz T Nat Hum Behav. 2023; 1(3).

PMID: 36711068 PMC: 9879335. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058.

Visual search habits and the spatial structure of scenes.

Clarke A, Nowakowska A, Hunt A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(6):1874-1885.

PMID: 35819714 PMC: 9338010. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02506-2.

Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review.

Vater C, Wolfe B, Rosenholtz R Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 29(5):1531-1557.

PMID: 35581490 PMC: 9568462. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02117-w.

References

Jiang Y, Wagner L . What is learned in spatial contextual cuing--configuration or individual locations?. Percept Psychophys. 2004; 66(3):454-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194893. View

Castelhano M, Henderson J . Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(4):753-63. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.753. View

Castelhano M, Pollatsek A, Cave K . Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008; 15(4):795-801. DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.795. View

Sturz B, Kelly D, Brown M . Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations. Anim Cogn. 2009; 13(2):341-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3. View

Epstein R, Ward E . How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(2):294-303. PMC: 2803731. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp099. View

Epstein R, Graham K, Downing P . Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron. 2003; 37(5):865-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00117-x. View

Friedman A . Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1979; 108(3):316-55. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.108.3.316. View

Chamizo V . Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003; 56(1):102-13. DOI: 10.1080/02724990244000205. View

Kanan C, Tong M, Zhang L, Cottrell G . SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics. Vis cogn. 2010; 17(6-7):979-1003. PMC: 2967792. DOI: 10.1080/13506280902771138. View

10.

Castelhano M, Heaven C . The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010; 72(5):1283-97. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1283. View

11.

Ehinger K, Hidalgo-Sotelo B, Torralba A, Oliva A . Modeling Search for People in 900 Scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Vis cogn. 2009; 17(6-7):945-978. PMC: 2790194. DOI: 10.1080/13506280902834720. View

12.

Neider M, Zelinsky G . Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Res. 2005; 46(5):614-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.025. View

13.

Kunar M, Flusberg S, Horowitz T, Wolfe J . Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(4):816-28. PMC: 2922990. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816. View

14.

Henderson J, Hollingworth A . High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999; 50:243-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243. View

15.

Castelhano M, Henderson J . The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(3):660-75. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660. View

16.

Henderson J . Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. Can J Psychol. 1992; 46(3):319-41. DOI: 10.1037/h0084325. View

17.

Rayner K, Pollatsek A . Eye movements and scene perception. Can J Psychol. 1992; 46(3):342-76. DOI: 10.1037/h0084328. View

18.

Epstein R, Kanwisher N . A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 1998; 392(6676):598-601. DOI: 10.1038/33402. View

19.

Biederman I, Mezzanotte R, RABINOWITZ J . Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol. 1982; 14(2):143-77. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-x. View

20.

Bar M . Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(8):617-29. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1476. View