» Articles » PMID: 21597930

"Graspability" of Objects Affects Gaze Patterns During Perception and Action Tasks

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 May 21
PMID 21597930
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When grasping an object, our gaze marks key positions to which the fingertips are directed. In contrast, eye fixations during perceptual tasks are typically concentrated on an object's centre of mass (COM). However, previous studies have typically required subjects to either grasp the object at predetermined sites or just look at computer-generated shapes "as a whole". In the current study, we investigated gaze fixations during a reaching and grasping task to symmetrical objects and compared these fixations with those made during a perceptual size estimation task using real (Experiment 1) and computer-generated objects (Experiment 2). Our results demonstrated similar gaze patterns in both perception and action to real objects. Participants first fixated a location towards the top edge of the object, consistent with index finger location during grasping, followed by a subsequent fixation towards the object's COM. In contrast, during the perceptual task to computer-generated objects, an opposite pattern in fixation locations was observed, where first fixations were closer to the COM, followed by a subsequent fixation towards the top edge. Even though differential fixation patterns were observed between studies, the area in which these fixations occurred, between the centre of the object and top edge, was the same in all tasks. These results demonstrate for the first time consistencies in fixation locations across both perception and action tasks, particularly when the same type of information (e.g. object size) is important for the completion of both tasks, with fixation locations increasing relative to the object's COM with increases in block height.

Citing Articles

Investigating how immersive virtual reality and active navigation mediate the experience of virtual concerts.

Lo S, Lai C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8507.

PMID: 37231095 PMC: 10211280. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35369-0.


Looking at the Ebbinghaus illusion: differences in neurocomputational requirements, not gaze-mediated attention, explain a classic perception-action dissociation.

Whitwell R, Garach M, Goodale M, Sperandio I Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 378(1869):20210459.

PMID: 36511402 PMC: 9745866. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0459.


Eye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping during obstacle avoidance.

Abbas H, Langridge R, Marotta J Exp Brain Res. 2021; 240(2):453-466.

PMID: 34787684 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06271-w.


Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.

Langridge R, Marotta J Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(6):1863-1875.

PMID: 33860822 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06101-z.


Object Properties Influence Visual Guidance of Motor Actions.

Scrafton S, Stainer M, Tatler B Vision (Basel). 2019; 3(2).

PMID: 31735829 PMC: 6802787. DOI: 10.3390/vision3020028.


References
1.
Jewell G, McCourt M . Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(1):93-110. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00045-7. View

2.
McCourt M, Garlinghouse M . Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(4):520-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00085-8. View

3.
Ben Hamed S, Duhamel J, Bremmer F, Graf W . Visual receptive field modulation in the lateral intraparietal area during attentive fixation and free gaze. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12(3):234-45. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.3.234. View

4.
Dijkerman H, McIntosh R, Schindler I, Nijboer T, Milner A . Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 47(6):1476-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.002. View

5.
van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh G . Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(8):1939-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.008. View