» Articles » PMID: 21586175

Suprasellar Cysts: Clinical Presentation, Surgical Indications, and Optimal Surgical Treatment

Overview
Journal BMC Neurol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 May 19
PMID 21586175
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To describe the clinical presentation of suprasellar cysts (SSCs) and surgical indications, and compare the treatment methods of endoscopic ventriculocystostomy (VC) and ventriculocystocisternotomy (VCC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 73 consecutive patients with SSC who were treated between June 2002 and September 2009. Twenty-two patients were treated with VC and 51 with VCC. Outcome was assessed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: The patients were divided into five groups based on age at presentation: age less than 1 year (n = 6), 1-5 years (n = 36), 6-10 years (n = 15), 11-20 years (n = 11), and 21-53 years (n = 5). The main clinical presentations were macrocrania (100%), motor deficits (50%), and gaze disturbance (33.3%) in the age less than 1 year group; macrocrania (75%), motor deficits (63.9%), and gaze disturbance (27.8%) in the 1-5 years group; macrocrania (46.7%), symptoms of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) (40.0%), endocrine dysfunction (40%), and seizures (33.3%) in the 6-10 years group; symptoms of raised ICP (54.5%), endocrine dysfunction (54.5%), and reduced visual field or acuity (36.4%) in the 11-20 years group; and symptoms of raised ICP (80.0%) and reduced visual field or acuity (40.0%) in the 21-53 years group. The overall success rate of endoscopic fenestration was 90.4%. A Kaplan-Meier curve for long-term efficacy of the two treatment modalities showed better results for VCC than for VC (p = 0.008).

Conclusions: Different age groups with SSCs have different main clinical presentations. VCC appears to be more efficacious than VC.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of neuroendoscopy for suprasellar arachnoid cysts: a single center experiences.

Kuzucu P, Kale A, Turkmen T, Gorur E, Borcek A BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):797.

PMID: 39633291 PMC: 11619261. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05273-1.


Arachnoid Cyst: An Asymptomatic Exuberance.

Santos A, Viegas A, Porto L, Gomes A, Nascimento E Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31782.

PMID: 36569705 PMC: 9775001. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31782.


A case of hydrocephalus confounded by suprasellar arachnoid cyst and concomitant reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.

Ahmad S, Zampolin R, Brook A, Kobets A, Altschul D Surg Neurol Int. 2022; 13:331.

PMID: 36128109 PMC: 9479517. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_313_2022.


A Neuronavigation-Assisted Endoscopic Ventriculocystocisternostomy of a Suprasellar Arachnoid Cyst: A 2D Video Case Presentation.

Daggubati L, Boukerche F, Rizk E Cureus. 2021; 13(5):e14957.

PMID: 34123654 PMC: 8191644. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14957.


Suprasellar arachnoid cysts: systematic analysis of 247 cases with long-term follow-up.

Ma G, Li X, Qiao N, Zhang B, Li C, Zhang Y Neurosurg Rev. 2021; 44(5):2755-2765.

PMID: 33409764 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01455-4.


References
1.
Fioravanti A, Godano U, Consales A, Mascari C, Calbucci F . Bobble-head doll syndrome due to a suprasellar arachnoid cyst: endoscopic treatment in two cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004; 20(10):770-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-004-0925-3. View

2.
Binitie O, Williams B, Case C . A suprasellar subarachnoid pouch; aetiological considerations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984; 47(10):1066-74. PMC: 1028035. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.47.10.1066. View

3.
Moon K, Lee J, Kim J, Kim S . Spontaneous disappearance of a suprasellar arachnoid cyst: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006; 23(1):99-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-006-0161-0. View

4.
Marinov M, Undjian S, Wetzka P . An evaluation of the surgical treatment of intracranial arachnoid cysts in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 1989; 5(3):177-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF00272123. View

5.
Sommer I, Smit L . Congenital supratentorial arachnoidal and giant cysts in children: a clinical study with arguments for a conservative approach. Childs Nerv Syst. 1997; 13(1):8-12. DOI: 10.1007/s003810050030. View