» Articles » PMID: 21584858

Expression and β-glucan Binding Properties of Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.) Antimicrobial Protein (Sp-AMP)

Overview
Journal Plant Mol Biol
Date 2011 May 18
PMID 21584858
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) secretes a number of small, highly-related, disulfide-rich proteins (Sp-AMPs) in response to challenges with fungal pathogens such as Heterobasidion annosum, although their biological role has been unknown. Here, we examined the expression patterns of these genes, as well as the structure and function of the encoded proteins. Northern blots and quantitative real time PCR showed increased levels of expression that are sustained during the interactions of host trees with pathogens, but not non-pathogens, consistent with a function in conifer tree defenses. Furthermore, the genes were up-regulated after treatment with salicylic acid and an ethylene precursor, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic-acid, but neither methyl jasmonate nor H(2)O(2) induced expression, indicating that Sp-AMP gene expression is independent of the jasmonic acid signaling pathways. The cDNA encoding one of the proteins was cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris. The purified protein had antifungal activity against H. annosum, and caused morphological changes in its hyphae and spores. It was directly shown to bind soluble and insoluble β-(1,3)-glucans, specifically and with high affinity. Furthermore, addition of exogenous glucan is linked to higher levels of Sp-AMP expression in the conifer. Homology modeling and sequence comparisons suggest that a conserved patch on the surface of the globular Sp-AMP is a carbohydrate-binding site that can accommodate approximately four sugar units. We conclude that these proteins belong to a new family of antimicrobial proteins (PR-19) that are likely to act by binding the glucans that are a major component of fungal cell walls.

Citing Articles

New Insights into Involvement of Low Molecular Weight Proteins in Complex Defense Mechanisms in Higher Plants.

Ruszczynska M, Sytykiewicz H Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39126099 PMC: 11313046. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158531.


Pathogenesis-Related Proteins (PRs) with Enzyme Activity Activating Plant Defense Responses.

Dos Santos C, Franco O Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37299204 PMC: 10255391. DOI: 10.3390/plants12112226.


Physico-chemical characterization and topological analysis of pathogenesis-related proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa using in-silico approaches.

Kaur A, Pati P, Pati A, Nagpal A PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239836.

PMID: 32986761 PMC: 7521741. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239836.


Defence transcriptome assembly and pathogenesis related gene family analysis in Pinus tecunumanii (low elevation).

Visser E, Wegrzyn J, Myburg A, Naidoo S BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):632.

PMID: 30139335 PMC: 6108113. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5015-0.


Defense-related proteins involved in sugarcane responses to biotic stress.

Souza T, Dias R, Silva-Filho M Genet Mol Biol. 2017; 40(1 suppl 1):360-372.

PMID: 28222203 PMC: 5452140. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0057.


References
1.
Ekramoddoullah A, Liu J, Zamani A . Cloning and Characterization of a Putative Antifungal Peptide Gene (Pm-AMP1) in Pinus monticola. Phytopathology. 2008; 96(2):164-70. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0164. View

2.
Bari R, Jones J . Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2008; 69(4):473-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0. View

3.
Benson D, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman D, Ostell J, Sayers E . GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 39(Database issue):D32-7. PMC: 3013681. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1079. View

4.
Thomma B, Eggermont K, Penninckx I, Mauch-Mani B, Vogelsang R, Cammue B . Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(25):15107-11. PMC: 24583. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15107. View

5.
Holm L . Unification of protein families. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998; 8(3):372-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80072-9. View