» Articles » PMID: 21566032

Quit Attempts and Quit Rates Among Menthol and Nonmenthol Smokers in the United States

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 May 14
PMID 21566032
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We compared quit attempts and quit rates among menthol and nonmenthol cigarette smokers in the United States.

Methods: We used data from the 2003 and 2006-2007 waves of the large, nationally representative Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey with control for state-level tobacco control spending, prices, and smoke-free air laws. We estimated mean prevalence, quit rates, and multivariate logistic regression equations by using self-respondent weights for menthol and nonmenthol smokers.

Results: In 2003 and 2007, 70% of smokers smoked nonmenthol cigarettes, 26% smoked menthol cigarettes, and 4% had no preference. Quit attempts were 4.3% higher in 2003 and 8.8% higher in 2007 among menthol than nonmenthol smokers. The likelihood of quitting was 3.5% lower for quitting in the past year and 6% lower for quitting in the past 5 years in menthol compared with nonmenthol smokers. Quit success in the past 5 years was further eroded among menthol-smoking Blacks and young adults.

Conclusions: Menthol smokers are more likely to make quit attempts, but are less successful at staying quit. The creation of menthol preference through marketing may reduce quit success.

Citing Articles

A Case for a Maternal Culturally Tailored Smoking Cessation Research Agenda.

Anderson D, McKnight T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(11).

PMID: 39595681 PMC: 11593514. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21111414.


Dietary Patterns among Smokers and Non-Smokers: Findings from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018.

Lin W, Alfheeaid H, Alasqah I, Alqarawi N, Alotaibi S, Alribdi F Nutrients. 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 38999783 PMC: 11243715. DOI: 10.3390/nu16132035.


Sociodemographic and Temporal Differences in Menthol Cigarette Use Among US Adults Who Smoke, 1999-2018.

Cheng Y, Tsai J, Cornelius M, Mahoney M, Neff L Prev Chronic Dis. 2024; 21:E20.

PMID: 38547020 PMC: 10996389. DOI: 10.5888/pcd21.230291.


A randomized controlled trial of potential tobacco policies prohibiting menthol flavor in cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a study protocol.

Bold K, Sharma A, Haeny A, Gueorguieva R, Buta E, Baldassarri S BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):201.

PMID: 38475757 PMC: 10935798. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05619-0.


The Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products.

Bold K, Kong G, OMalley S Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024; 20(1):381-406.

PMID: 38346292 PMC: 11446566. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-075624.


References
1.
Cummings K, Morley C, Horan J, Steger C . Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control. 2002; 11 Suppl 1:I5-17. PMC: 1766057. DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i5. View

2.
Pletcher M, Hulley B, Houston T, Kiefe C, Benowitz N, Sidney S . Menthol cigarettes, smoking cessation, atherosclerosis, and pulmonary function: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(17):1915-22. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1915. View

3.
Tauras J, Levy D, Chaloupka F, Villanti A, Niaura R, Vallone D . Menthol and non-menthol smoking: the impact of prices and smoke-free air laws. Addiction. 2010; 105 Suppl 1:115-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03206.x. View

4.
Sutton C, Robinson R . The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6 Suppl 1:S83-91. DOI: 10.1080/14622203310001649504. View

5.
Levy D, Friend K . The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know?. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(5):592-609. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyf045. View