Peri-anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Femur Fracture: a Biomechanical Analysis of the Femoral Tunnel As a Stress Riser
Overview
General Surgery
Orthopedics
Affiliations
Purpose: Sixteen case reports of distal femur fractures as post-operative complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been described in the literature. The femoral tunnel has been suggested as a potential stress riser for fracture formation. Additionally, double bundle ACL reconstructions may compound this risk. This is the first biomechanical study to examine the significance of a stress riser effect of the femoral tunnel(s) after ACL reconstruction. The hypotheses tested in this study are that the femoral tunnel acts as a stress riser for fracture and that this effect increases with the size of the tunnel (8 mm vs. 10 mm) and with the number of tunnels (1 vs. 2).
Methods: Femoral tunnels simulating single bundle (SB) hamstring graft (8 mm), bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (10 mm), and double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction (7, 6 mm) were drilled in fourth-generation saw bones. These three experimental groups and a control group consisting of native saw bones without tunnels were loaded to failure.
Results: All fractures occurred through the tunnels in the DB group, whereas fractures did not consistently occur through the tunnels in the SB groups. The mean fracture load was 6,145N ± 471N in the native group, 5,691N ± 198N in the 8 mm SB group, 5,702N ± 282N in the 10 mm SB group, and 4,744N ± 418N in the DB group. The mean fracture load for the DB group was significantly lower when compared to the native, 8 mm SB, and 10 mm SB groups independently (P value = 0.0016, 0.0060, and 0.0038, respectively). The mean fracture loads for neither SB groups were not significantly different from the native group.
Conclusions: An anatomically placed femoral tunnel in single bundle ACL reconstruction in our experimental model was not a significant stress riser to fracture, whereas the two femoral tunnels in double bundle ACL reconstruction significantly decreased load to failure. The results support the sparsity of reported peri-ACL reconstruction femur fractures in single femoral tunnel techniques. However, the increased fracture risk in double bundle ACL reconstruction may be a cause for concern and impact patient selection.
Watanabe A, Kikuchi N, Ichihara T, Kumagai H, Taniguchi Y, Sato Y Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58366.
PMID: 38756267 PMC: 11097233. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58366.
Colantonio D, Kicklighter R, Le A, Nowicki M, Posner M, Zhou L Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(1):e93-e101.
PMID: 36866315 PMC: 9971884. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.10.012.
Hatch 3rd G, Bolia I, Lindsay A, Haratian A, Hasan L, Cohen L Trauma Case Rep. 2022; 37:100584.
PMID: 35036510 PMC: 8743244. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100584.
Ceynowa M, Zerdzicki K, Klosowski P, Pankowski R, Roclawski M, Mazurek T PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241143.
PMID: 33119661 PMC: 7595401. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241143.
Uncommon Complications after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Palazzolo A, Rosso F, Bonasia D, Saccia F, Rossi R Joints. 2018; 6(3):188-203.
PMID: 30582108 PMC: 6301892. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675799.