» Articles » PMID: 21562270

Neural Correlates of Biased Competition in Premotor Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 May 13
PMID 21562270
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been proposed that whenever an animal faces several action choices, their neural representations are processed in parallel in frontoparietal cortex and compete in a manner biased by any factor relevant to the decision. We tested this hypothesis by recording single-unit activity in dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) while a monkey performed two delayed center-out reaching tasks. In the one-target task, a single target was presented and its border style indicated its reward value. The two-target task was the same except two targets were presented and the value of each was varied. During the delay period of the one-target task, directionally tuned PMd activity showed no modulation with value. In contrast, during the two-target task, the same neurons showed strong effects of the value associated with their preferred target, always in relation to the value of the other target. Furthermore, the competition between action choices was strongest when targets were furthest apart. This angular distance effect appeared in neural activity as soon as cells became tuned, while modulation by relative value appeared much later. All of these findings can be reproduced by a computational model which suggests that decisions between actions are made through a biased competition taking place within a sensorimotor map of potential actions.

Citing Articles

Computational mechanism underlying switching of motor actions.

Zhong S, Pouratian N, Christopoulos V PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 21(2):e1012811.

PMID: 39928670 PMC: 11875378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012811.


"PyTDL": A versatile temporal difference learning algorithm to simulate behavior process of decision making and cognitive learning.

Wu Q, Yang X, Wang K, Zhu M, Liang J, Han Y iScience. 2025; 28(1):111600.

PMID: 39834866 PMC: 11743081. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111600.


A neural basis of choking under pressure.

Smoulder A, Marino P, Oby E, Snyder S, Miyata H, Pavlovsky N Neuron. 2024; 112(20):3424-3433.e8.

PMID: 39270654 PMC: 11791831. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.012.


Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach.

Cecchini G, DePass M, Baspinar E, Andujar M, Ramawat S, Pani P Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1399394.

PMID: 39188591 PMC: 11346247. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399394.


Biomechanical costs influence decisions made during ongoing actions.

Canaveral C, Lata W, Green A, Cisek P J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(2):461-469.

PMID: 38988286 PMC: 11427048. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00090.2024.


References
1.
Herrnstein R . Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:267-72. PMC: 1404074. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. View

2.
Roesch M, Olson C . Neuronal activity related to reward value and motivation in primate frontal cortex. Science. 2004; 304(5668):307-10. DOI: 10.1126/science.1093223. View

3.
Ghez C, Favilla M, Ghilardi M, Gordon J, Bermejo R, Pullman S . Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 115(2):217-33. DOI: 10.1007/pl00005692. View

4.
Basso M, WURTZ R . Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(18):7519-34. PMC: 6793246. View

5.
DeSimone R, Duncan J . Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995; 18:193-222. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205. View