» Articles » PMID: 21561522

Reining in the Pharmacological Enhancement Train: We Should Remain Vigilant About Regulatory Standards for Prescribing Controlled Substances

Overview
Date 2011 May 13
PMID 21561522
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article challenges recent assumptions that physicians may ethically and legally prescribe psychopharmacological enhancement drugs to patients and the counterintuitive notion that in some cases ingesting an enhancement drug constitutes the more ethical choice than foregoing this option. Enhancement proponents have touted modafinil as an ideal mechanism to improve concentration, alertness, and forego sleep and keep pace with our society's demands. However, patients who use modafinil for these reasons risk potentially severe side effects and addiction, and face unintended consequences related to their cognitive, emotive, and physiological functioning. Importantly, prescribing a controlled substance such as modafinil for performance enhancement and sleep avoidance runs contrary to a physician's ethical duty to the patient and the standard of practice set forth in legal requirements governing the prescription of controlled substances.

Citing Articles

Emerging Therapeutic Enhancement Enabling Health Technologies and Their Discourses: What Is Discussed within the Health Domain?.

Wolbring G, Diep L, Yumakulov S, Ball N, Leopatra V, Yergens D Healthcare (Basel). 2016; 1(1):20-52.

PMID: 27429129 PMC: 4934504. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare1010020.


Reflections on Addiction in Students Using Stimulants for Neuroenhancement: A Preliminary Interview Study.

Hildt E, Lieb K, Bagusat C, Franke A Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:621075.

PMID: 26064931 PMC: 4433654. DOI: 10.1155/2015/621075.


Pharmacological cognitive enhancement-how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate.

Maslen H, Faulmuller N, Savulescu J Front Syst Neurosci. 2014; 8:107.

PMID: 24999320 PMC: 4052735. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00107.