» Articles » PMID: 21560195

Individual Health Discount Rate in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 May 12
PMID 21560195
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In cost-effectiveness analysis, discount rates are used in calculating the value of future costs and benefits. However, standard discount rates may not accurately describe the decision-making of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). These patients often choose the long-term risks of immunosuppressive therapy over the short-term risks of colectomy, demonstrating very high discount rates for future health. In this study we aimed to measure the discount rate in UC patients and identify variables associated with the discount rate.

Methods: We surveyed patients with UC and patients who were postcolectomy for UC to measure their valuations of UC and colectomy health states. We used Standard Gamble (SG) and Time-Trade-Off (TTO) methods to assess current and future health state valuations and calculated the discount rate.

Results: Participants included 150 subjects with UC and 150 subjects who were postcolectomy for UC. Adjusted discount rates varied widely (0%-100%), with an overall median rate of 55.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 20.6-100), which was significantly higher than the standard rate of 5%. Within the normal range of discount rates, patients' expected discount rate increased by 0.80% for each additional year of age, and female patients had discount rates that averaged ≈ 8% less than their age-matched counterparts and approached statistical significance.

Conclusions: The accepted discount rate of 5% grossly underestimates UC patients' preference for long-term over short-term risk. This might explain UC patients' frequent choice of the long-term risks of immunosuppressive medical therapy over the short-term risks of colectomy.

Citing Articles

Patient preferences for surgical versus medical therapy for ulcerative colitis.

Bewtra M, Kilambi V, Fairchild A, Siegel C, Lewis J, Reed Johnson F Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013; 20(1):103-14.

PMID: 24280881 PMC: 4137889. DOI: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000437498.14804.50.


Assessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative data.

Bewtra M, Reed Johnson F Patient. 2013; 6(4):241-55.

PMID: 24127239 PMC: 3865778. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0031-2.


Proximity to disease and perception of utility: physicians' vs patients' assessment of treatment options for ulcerative colitis.

Brown L, Waljee A, Higgins P, Waljee J, Morris A Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54(12):1529-36.

PMID: 22067181 PMC: 5361885. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823436a8.


Optimal use and cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease.

Di Sabatino A, Liberato L, Marchetti M, Biancheri P, Corazza G Intern Emerg Med. 2011; 6 Suppl 1:17-27.

PMID: 22009609 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-011-0673-9.

References
1.
Gyrd-Hansen D, Kristiansen I, Nexoe J, Nielsen J . How do individuals apply risk information when choosing among health care interventions?. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(4):697-704. DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00348. View

2.
Krahn M, Gafni A . Discounting in the economic evaluation of health care interventions. Med Care. 1993; 31(5):403-18. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199305000-00003. View

3.
Olsen J . Time preferences for health gains: an empirical investigation. Health Econ. 1993; 2(3):257-65. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4730020309. View

4.
Austin P, Escobar M, Kopec J . The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Qual Life Res. 2001; 9(8):901-10. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008938326604. View

5.
Arias E . United States life tables, 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006; 54(14):1-40. View