» Articles » PMID: 21558845

Age and the Difference Between Awake Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Office Blood Pressure: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2011 May 12
PMID 21558845
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) (ABP) is a better predictor of adverse cardiovascular events than office BP (OBP). Owing to the extensive literature on the 'white coat effect', it is widely believed that ABP tends to be lower than OBP, with statements to this effect in Joint National Committee VII. However, recent evidence suggests that the difference varies systematically with age.

Methods: We searched PubMed to identify population studies, published before April 2009, which assessed OBP and either ABP or home BP (HBP). On account of significant heterogeneity in the outcomes, random effect models were used for the meta-analyses.

Results: OBP increased with age more steeply than awake ABP. OBP became higher than awake systolic/diastolic ABP at the age of 51.3/42.7 years in men (13 studies, N=3562) and 51.9/42.3 years in women (11 studies, N=2585). In the data in which OBP and HBP were measured (eight studies, N=4916), OBP was higher than HBP at all ages. In the data in which OBP, awake ABP, and HBP were all measured (two studies, N=895), awake ABP was higher than HBP at younger ages, becoming similar at the older age.

Conclusion: OBP tends to be higher than awake ABP only after the age of 50 years for systolic and after the age of 45 years for diastolic BP, but is lower than ABP at younger ages; in contrast OBP tends to exceed HBP at all ages.

Citing Articles

Influence of intelligent management mode based on Internet of Things on self-management ability and prognosis of elderly patients with hypertensive heart disease: An observational study.

Xu Y, Zai W, Yang M, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Fu X Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(22):e38179.

PMID: 39259109 PMC: 11142800. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038179.


Hypertension in frail older adults: current perspectives.

Li L, Duan L, Xu Y, Ruan H, Zhang M, Zheng Y PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17760.

PMID: 39006023 PMC: 11246622. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17760.


Twenty-five years of research on syncope.

Fedorowski A, Kulakowski P, Brignole M, de Lange F, Kenny R, Moya A Europace. 2023; 25(8).

PMID: 37622579 PMC: 10450792. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad163.


Persistence and determinants of blood pressure phenotypes according to office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in youth.

Martinez F, Redon J, Aguilar F, Calderon J, Lurbe E Hypertens Res. 2023; 46(5):1257-1266.

PMID: 36635525 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-01159-w.


Hypertension-mediated organ damage in masked hypertension.

Hinderliter A, Lin F, Viera L, Olsson E, Klein J, Viera A J Hypertens. 2022; 40(4):811-818.

PMID: 35102084 PMC: 8908898. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003084.


References
1.
Pickering T, Davidson K, Gerin W, Schwartz J . Masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2002; 40(6):795-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000038733.08436.98. View

2.
Stergiou G, Rarra V, Yiannes N . Changing relationship between home and office blood pressure with increasing age in children: the Arsakeion School study. Am J Hypertens. 2008; 21(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2007.18. View

3.
Terawaki H, Metoki H, Nakayama M, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Asayama K . Masked hypertension determined by self-measured blood pressure at home and chronic kidney disease in the Japanese general population: the Ohasama study. Hypertens Res. 2009; 31(12):2129-35. DOI: 10.1291/hypres.31.2129. View

4.
Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, Nagai K, Kato J, Kikuchi N . Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens. 1998; 16(7):971-5. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199816070-00010. View

5.
Hara A, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Shintani Y, Obara T, Metoki H . Detection of carotid atherosclerosis in individuals with masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension by self-measured blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens. 2007; 25(2):321-7. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280115bbf. View