» Articles » PMID: 21552210

Biomarkers and Microsatellite Instability Analysis of Curettings Can Predict the Behavior of FIGO Stage I Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Mod Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2011 May 10
PMID 21552210
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The prognostic value of molecular biomarkers, microsatellite instability, DNA ploidy and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis in endometrial cancer is conflicting, possibly due to the fact that different studies have used mixtures of histotypes, FIGO stages and different non-standardized non-automated methods. We have evaluated the prognostic value of classical prognostic factors, molecular biomarkers, microsatellite instability, DNA ploidy and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis in a population-based cohort of FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Curettings of 224 FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients were reviewed. Clinical information, including follow-up, was obtained from the patients' charts. Microsatellite instability and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis were obtained in whole tissue sections and molecular biomarkers using tissue microarrays. DNA ploidy was analyzed by image cytometry. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier method) and multivariate (Cox model) survival analysis was performed. With median follow-up of 66 months (1-209), 14 (6%) patients developed metastases. Age, microsatellite instability, molecular biomarkers (p16, p21, p27, p53 and survivin) and morphometric mean shortest nuclear axis had prognostic value. With multivariate analysis, combined survivin, p21 and microsatellite instability overshadowed all other variables. Patients in which any of these features had favorable values had an excellent prognosis, in contrast to those with either high survivin or low p21 (97 vs 78% survival, P<0.0001, hazard ratio=7.8). Combined high survivin and low p21 values and microsatellite instability high identified a small subgroup with an especially poor prognosis (survival rate 57%, P=0.01, hazard ratio=5.6). We conclude that low p21 and high survivin expression are poor prognosis indicators in FIGO stage I endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, especially when high microsatellite instability occurs.

Citing Articles

microRNA profile of endometrial cancer from Indian patients-identification of potential biomarkers for prognosis.

Hegde S, Wagh K, Narayana S, Abikar A, Nambiar S, Ananthamurthy S Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024; 39:101812.

PMID: 39282095 PMC: 11395764. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101812.


Tools for establishing a sustainable safety culture within maternity services. A retrospective case study.

Loland M, Braut G, Lichtenberg S, Egenberg S SAGE Open Med. 2023; 11:20503121231164264.

PMID: 37026106 PMC: 10071155. DOI: 10.1177/20503121231164264.


Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review.

Hernandez J, Gonzalez-Montiel A, Allos-Villalva J, Cantu D, Barquet S, Olivares-Mundo A J Cancer Res Ther (Manch). 2021; 7(3):17-28.

PMID: 34322276 PMC: 8315102. DOI: 10.14312/2052-4994.2019-3.


BIRC5 is a prognostic biomarker associated with tumor immune cell infiltration.

Xu L, Yu W, Xiao H, Lin K Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):390.

PMID: 33431968 PMC: 7801710. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79736-7.


Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

McMeekin D, Tritchler D, Cohn D, Mutch D, Lankes H, Geller M J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(25):3062-8.

PMID: 27325856 PMC: 5012715. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8722.