» Articles » PMID: 21538049

Metabolic Effects of Contraceptive Steroids

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2011 May 4
PMID 21538049
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Estrogen and progestins have been used by millions of women as effective combined contraceptives. The safety of hormonal contraceptives has been documented by years of follow-up and serious adverse events that may be related to their use are rare in the young population exposed to these agents. The balance between the benefits and the risks of contraceptive steroids is generally positive in particular when comparing to the risks of pregnancy and especially in women with risk factors. The metabolic changes induced by the synthetic steroids used in contraception, such as lipoprotein changes, insulin response to glucose, and coagulation factors have been considered as potential markers of cardiovascular and venous risk. Observations of these effects have led to modifications of the composition of hormonal contraceptive in order to minimize these changes and hence potentially decrease the risks. The synthetic estrogen Ethinyl-Estradiol (EE) exerts a stronger effect that natural estradiol (E2) on hepatic metabolism including estrogen-dependent markers such as liver proteins. This stronger hepatic impact of EE has been related to its 17α-ethinyl group which prevents the inactivation of the molecule and results in a more pronounced hepatic effect of EE as compared to estradiol. Due to its strong activity, administering EE via a non-oral route does not prevent its impact on liver proteins. In order to circumvent the metabolic changes induced by EE, newer products using more natural compounds such as estradiol (E2) and estradiol valerate (E2V) have been introduced. The synthetic progestins used for contraception are structurally related either to testosterone (T) (estranes and gonanes) or to progesterone (pregnanes and 19-norpregnanes). Several new progestins have been designed to bind more specifically to the progesterone receptor and to minimize side-effects related to androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid receptor interactions. Dienogest (DNG), and drospirenone (DRSP) and the 19-norpregnanes including Nestorone® (NES), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) and trimegestone (TMG) have been combined with estrogen either EE or E2 or estradiol valerate (E2V). Risks and benefits of the newer progestins used in contraception depend upon the type of molecular structure, the type and dose of estrogen associated in a combination and the route of administration. The lower metabolic impact of estradiol-based combinations may result in an improved safety profile, but large surveillance studies are warranted to confirm this plausible hypothesis. So far, the contraindications and warnings for use of current COCs also apply to the estradiol-based COCs.

Citing Articles

Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.

Oliveira G, Almeida M, Arcelus C, Espindola L, Rivera M, Silva-Filho A Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.

PMID: 39530071 PMC: 11554338. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo100.


The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on the Incidence and Progression of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women: A Systematic Review.

Asubiaro J Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65366.

PMID: 39184751 PMC: 11344578. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65366.


Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.

Oliveira G, Almeida M, Arcelus C, Espindola L, Rivera M, Silva-Filho A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(7):e20240478.

PMID: 39166619 PMC: 11341215. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20240478.


Experts' view on the role of oestrogens in combined oral contraceptives: emphasis on oestetrol (E4).

Creinin M, Cagnacci A, Spaczynski R, Stute P, Chabbert-Buffet N, Korver T Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1395863.

PMID: 38655395 PMC: 11035732. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1395863.


Assessment of liver function tests of women taking hormonal contraceptives at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital and Family Guidance Association of Gondar (FGAE), 2022; a comparative cross-sectional study.

Chane E, Wondifraw H, Hadgu R, Fasil A PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289746.

PMID: 37590278 PMC: 10434896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289746.


References
1.
Kuhl H . Effects of progestogens on haemostasis. Maturitas. 1996; 24(1-2):1-19. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(96)00994-2. View

2.
Kulkarni H, Gaitonde B, BANDISODE M . Oral contraceptives: effects on carbohydrate metabolism, insulin like activity and histology of the pancreas. Horm Metab Res. 1980; 12(10):497-504. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999186. View

3.
Dorangeon P, Thomas J, CHOISY H, Lumbroso M, HAZARD M . Effects of nomegestrol acetate on carbohydrate metabolism. Diabete Metab. 1993; 19(5):441-5. View

4.
Vaughan B, Trussell J, Kost K, Singh S, Jones R . Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception. 2008; 78(4):271-83. PMC: 2800035. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.05.007. View

5.
Steingold K, Cefalu W, Pardridge W, Judd H, Chaudhuri G . Enhanced hepatic extraction of estrogens used for replacement therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986; 62(4):761-6. DOI: 10.1210/jcem-62-4-761. View