» Articles » PMID: 21517206

Internal Representations Reveal Cultural Diversity in Expectations of Facial Expressions of Emotion

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Apr 27
PMID 21517206
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial expressions have long been considered the "universal language of emotion." Yet consistent cultural differences in the recognition of facial expressions contradict such notions (e.g., R. E. Jack, C. Blais, C. Scheepers, P. G. Schyns, & R. Caldara, 2009). Rather, culture--as an intricate system of social concepts and beliefs--could generate different expectations (i.e., internal representations) of facial expression signals. To investigate, they used a powerful psychophysical technique (reverse correlation) to estimate the observer-specific internal representations of the 6 basic facial expressions of emotion (i.e., happy, surprise, fear, disgust, anger, and sad) in two culturally distinct groups (i.e., Western Caucasian [WC] and East Asian [EA]). Using complementary statistical image analyses, cultural specificity was directly revealed in these representations. Specifically, whereas WC internal representations predominantly featured the eyebrows and mouth, EA internal representations showed a preference for expressive information in the eye region. Closer inspection of the EA observer preference revealed a surprising feature: changes of gaze direction, shown primarily among the EA group. For the first time, it is revealed directly that culture can finely shape the internal representations of common facial expressions of emotion, challenging notions of a biologically hardwired "universal language of emotion."

Citing Articles

Culture shapes how we describe facial expressions.

Wnuk E, Wodowski J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21589.

PMID: 39284841 PMC: 11405906. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72432-w.


Variations in the Appearance and Interpretation of Interpersonal Eye Contact in Social Categorizations and Psychiatric Populations Worldwide: A Scoping Review with a Critical Appraisal of the Literature.

Boer J, Boonstra N, Kronenberg L, Stekelenburg R, Sizoo B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200701 PMC: 11354482. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081092.


Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.

Cheung O, Quimpo N, Smoley J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16068.

PMID: 38992163 PMC: 11239880. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.


How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: a large-scale experiment across North America, Europe, and Japan.

Cowen A, Brooks J, Prasad G, Tanaka M, Kamitani Y, Kirilyuk V Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1350631.

PMID: 38966733 PMC: 11223574. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1350631.


No evidence for an other-race effect in dominance and trustworthy judgements from faces.

Wang A, Quinn B, Gofton H, Andrews T Perception. 2024; 53(9):632-644.

PMID: 38881389 PMC: 11348627. DOI: 10.1177/03010066241258204.