Acharya S, Preda M, Papatheodorou I, Palioura D, Giardoglou P, Tsata V
Open Res Eur. 2024; 3:55.
PMID: 38689633
PMC: 11058455.
DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.15746.2.
Cengher M, Kodak T
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023; 38(2):85-94.
PMID: 36618972
PMC: 9747994.
DOI: 10.1007/s40616-022-00172-x.
Jauregui J, Artino Jr A, Ilgen J, Sullivan G, van Schaik S
Med Educ Online. 2022; 27(1):2016561.
PMID: 34994681
PMC: 8745374.
DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2016561.
Tullu M, Karande S
J Postgrad Med. 2020; 66(1):1-6.
PMID: 31898597
PMC: 6970322.
DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_492_19.
Kennedy A
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2017; 10(4):5-7.
PMID: 29209443
PMC: 5706536.
Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.
Janke K, Bzowyckyj A, Traynor A
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017; 81(4):73.
PMID: 28630514
PMC: 5468711.
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe81473.
Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review.
Yarris L, Gottlieb M, Scott K, Sampson C, Rose E, Chan T
West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18(4):721-728.
PMID: 28611894
PMC: 5468079.
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2017.2.33430.
Reviews, reviewers and reviewing.
Zazgyva A, Kon E, Mauffrey C, Mavrogenis A, Scarlat M
Int Orthop. 2016; 41(1):1-2.
PMID: 27913857
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3360-7.
Peer review and the publication process.
Ali P, Watson R
Nurs Open. 2016; 3(4):193-202.
PMID: 27708830
PMC: 5050543.
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.51.
Preparing tomorrow's behavioral medicine scientists and practitioners: a survey of future directions for education and training.
Goldstein C, Minges K, Schoffman D, Cases M
J Behav Med. 2016; 40(1):214-226.
PMID: 27365056
PMC: 5201445.
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9758-2.
'Scholarly peer reviewing': The art, its joys and woes.
Kurdi M
Indian J Anaesth. 2015; 59(8):465-70.
PMID: 26379288
PMC: 4551022.
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.162981.
Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
Gasparyan A, Gerasimov A, Voronov A, Kitas G
J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30(4):360-4.
PMID: 25829801
PMC: 4366954.
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.360.
Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.
Bowman J
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015; 78(10):176.
PMID: 25657363
PMC: 4315198.
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7810176.
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.
Resnik D, Elmore S
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015; 22(1):169-88.
PMID: 25633924
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5.
Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions.
Venne V
J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(2):189-92.
PMID: 25527418
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9802-8.
Becoming a peer reviewer: engaging in sharing and gaining knowledge.
Ramsden V, Pimlott N, Woollard R, Kvern B, Handford C, Dunikowski L
Can Fam Physician. 2014; 60(12):1158-60.
PMID: 25500606
PMC: 4264815.
Peer review process in medical journals.
Cho Y, Park H
Korean J Fam Med. 2013; 34(6):372-6.
PMID: 24340158
PMC: 3856278.
DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.6.372.
The ethics of peer review in bioethics.
Wendler D, Miller F
J Med Ethics. 2013; 40(10):697-701.
PMID: 24131903
PMC: 4155015.
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101364.
Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay.
Cornelius J
Australas Med J. 2012; 5(1):26-9.
PMID: 22905052
PMC: 3413928.
DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.1165.
A proton nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabonomics study of metabolic profiling in immunoglobulin a nephropathy.
Sui W, Li L, Che W, Guimai Z, Chen J, Li W
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012; 67(4):363-73.
PMID: 22522762
PMC: 3317244.
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(04)10.