» Articles » PMID: 21505912

Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-review Journals: a Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers

Overview
Journal Ann Behav Med
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2011 Apr 21
PMID 21505912
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews.

Purpose: In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavioral Medicine and describe the general and specific elements that should be included in a high-quality review for the journal.

Conclusion: We conclude by offering exemplar reviews of a manuscript that was ultimately accepted for publication in the journal and provide commentary on specific aspects of these reviews.

Citing Articles

The science behind soft skills: Do's and Don'ts for early career researchers and beyond. A review paper from the EU-CardioRNA COST Action CA17129.

Acharya S, Preda M, Papatheodorou I, Palioura D, Giardoglou P, Tsata V Open Res Eur. 2024; 3:55.

PMID: 38689633 PMC: 11058455. DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.15746.2.


Development of a Reviewer Mentoring Program in the Analysis of Verbal Behavior.

Cengher M, Kodak T Anal Verbal Behav. 2023; 38(2):85-94.

PMID: 36618972 PMC: 9747994. DOI: 10.1007/s40616-022-00172-x.


Publishing your scholarship: a survey of pearls from top reviewers.

Jauregui J, Artino Jr A, Ilgen J, Sullivan G, van Schaik S Med Educ Online. 2022; 27(1):2016561.

PMID: 34994681 PMC: 8745374. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2016561.


Peer reviewing an original research paper.

Tullu M, Karande S J Postgrad Med. 2020; 66(1):1-6.

PMID: 31898597 PMC: 6970322. DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_492_19.


Incentivizing Peer Review.

Kennedy A Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2017; 10(4):5-7.

PMID: 29209443 PMC: 5706536.