» Articles » PMID: 21504332

Future Acceptance of an Artificial Pancreas in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Overview
Date 2011 Apr 21
PMID 21504332
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine future acceptance of an artificial pancreas (AP) and its perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device.

Methods: A questionnaire, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine future acceptance with its determinants and intention to use the AP. One hundred thirty-two patients with diabetes type 1 treated with insulin pump therapy completed the questionnaire. Using factor analysis and reliability analysis, the number of items was reduced from 34 to 15.

Results: The response rate was 66%. The subjects had a mean age of 43 years, and 34% were male. Almost 75% had the intention to use an AP. There were high scores on perceived usefulness (expected improvement of glucose control: 35.6% moderately agreed and 53% strongly agreed), perceived ease of use (expectation that the AP can be easily handled: 33.3% moderately agreed and 53.8% strongly agreed), and trust (administration of correct insulin dose and reliability of glucose measurement: 40.9% and 38.9% moderately agreed, whereas 32.6% and 28.2% strongly agreed, respectively).

Conclusions: A newly developed questionnaire examining the acceptance of an AP indicated that most patients with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion-treated type 1 diabetes have the intention to use an AP system and have a positive attitude toward perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust.

Citing Articles

Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure.

Franceschi R, Pertile R, Marigliano M, Mozzillo E, Maffeis C, Zaffani S Acta Diabetol. 2024; 62(2):177-183.

PMID: 39126517 PMC: 11861114. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9.


Measures of Patient-Reported Expectations, Acceptance, and Satisfaction Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Review.

Marigliano M, Mozzillo E, Mancioppi V, Candia F, Rosanio F, Antonelli A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37511644 PMC: 10382040. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071031.


Perceptions and expectations of adults with type 1 diabetes for the use of artificial pancreas systems with and without glucagon addition: Results of an online survey.

Taleb N, Quintal A, Rakheja R, Messier V, Legault L, Racine E Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020; 31(2):658-665.

PMID: 33358714 PMC: 7886941. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.10.006.


Information and communication technology enabling partnership in person-centred diabetes management: building a theoretical framework from an inductive case study in The Netherlands.

Wildevuur S, Simonse L, Groenewegen P, Klink A BMJ Open. 2019; 9(6):e025930.

PMID: 31209085 PMC: 6589019. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025930.


A Clinical Guide to Advanced Diabetes Devices and Closed-Loop Systems Using the CARES Paradigm.

Messer L, Berget C, Forlenza G Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019; 21(8):462-469.

PMID: 31140878 PMC: 6653788. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0105.