» Articles » PMID: 21503652

Sense of Agency in Joint Action: Influence of Human and Computer Co-actors

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Apr 20
PMID 21503652
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intentional binding is the perceived shortening of the time between a voluntary action and its consequent effect and has been suggested as an implicit measure of agency. This shortening has been linked to processes underlying action preparation and is also affected by post-movement feedback. Intentional binding has been demonstrated in joint action tasks involving two humans, but it is unknown whether it occurs for tasks involving a human working alongside a non-human partner. This experiment investigated the influence of high-level feedback on the experience of agency and whether binding occurs in human-computer joint action settings. Participants were involved in two versions an action task involving another 'agent'. In one version, two participants (a genuine participant and a confederate) sat side by side, separated by a curtain that prevented vision of the other person. In baseline conditions, both participants were instructed to make a self-paced action and judge the time of the action by reporting the position of a rotating clock-hand on a computer screen. In other baseline conditions, participants judged the time of an auditory tone. In operant conditions, participants made actions and the genuine participant's action was followed 200 ms later by a tone on every trial. To examine the effect of post-movement information on binding and explicit agency judgments, a colour cue was presented on each trial informing participants about which person's action caused the tone. In another version of the task, participants were paired with a computer instead of a human co-actor. Post-movement information affected the genuine participant's explicit agency judgments but had no effect on intentional binding, which always occurred. In the human-computer version, participants never showed binding, even when they explicitly judged that their action had caused the tone. We suggest that human-human partnerships result in the formation of a new 'we' agentic identity, but that human-computer partnerships lead to inhibition of the processes that mediate the pre-reflective sense of agency.

Citing Articles

Self-other distinction modulates the sense of self-agency during joint actions.

Zapparoli L, Mariano M, Sacheli L, Berni T, Negrone C, Toneatto C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30055.

PMID: 39627377 PMC: 11615402. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80880-7.


The time course of Temporal Binding in social and nonsocial interactions.

Silver C, Tatler B, Chakravarthi R, Timmermans B Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):326-341.

PMID: 39020241 PMC: 11836101. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02540-1.


Arousal, interindividual differences and temporal binding a psychophysiological study.

Render A, Eisenbarth H, Oxner M, Jansen P Psychol Res. 2024; 88(5):1653-1677.

PMID: 38806732 PMC: 11282159. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01976-3.


The effect of group size and task involvement on temporal binding window in clap perception.

Niizato T, Nishiyama Y, Zempo K, Koike Y, Arai K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1355586.

PMID: 38721312 PMC: 11076830. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355586.


Sense of agency in joint action: a critical review of we-agency.

Le Besnerais A, Moore J, Berberian B, Grynszpan O Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1331084.

PMID: 38356772 PMC: 10864478. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331084.


References
1.
Nahab F, Kundu P, Gallea C, Kakareka J, Pursley R, Pohida T . The neural processes underlying self-agency. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 21(1):48-55. PMC: 3000563. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq059. View

2.
Atmaca S, Sebanz N, Prinz W, Knoblich G . Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3(3-4):410-20. DOI: 10.1080/17470910801900908. View

3.
Strother L, House K, Obhi S . Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions. Conscious Cogn. 2010; 19(1):12-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.007. View

4.
Wohlschlager A, Haggard P, Gesierich B, Prinz W . The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(6):586-91. DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1469.x. View

5.
Ebert J, Wegner D . Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Conscious Cogn. 2009; 19(1):481-9. PMC: 2836403. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002. View