» Articles » PMID: 21500008

Ethics of Using Assistive Technology in the Care for Community-dwelling Elderly People: an Overview of the Literature

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2011 Apr 19
PMID 21500008
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This article provides an overview of the international literature on the most important ethical considerations in the field of assistive technology (AT) in the care for community-dwelling elderly people, focused on dementia.

Method: A systematic literature review was performed.

Results: A total of 46 papers met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes were found. The first theme, personal living environment, involves the subthemes privacy, autonomy and obtrusiveness. The second theme, the outside world, involves the subthemes stigma and human contact. The third theme, the design of AT devices, involves the subthemes individual approach, affordability and safety. The often referred to umbrella term of 'obtrusiveness' is frequently used by many authors in the discussion, while a clear description of the concept is mostly absent.

Conclusion: When it comes to AT use in the care for elderly people living at home, ethical debate appears not to be a priority. The little discussion there relies heavily on thick concepts such as autonomy and obtrusiveness which seem to complicate the debate rather than clarify it, because they contain many underlying ambiguous concepts and assumptions. Most encountered ethical objections originate from the view that people are, or should be, independent and self-determinant. It is questionable whether the view is correct and helpful in the debate on AT use in the care for (frail) elderly people. Other ethical approaches that view people as social and reciprocal might be more applicable and shed a different light on the ethical aspects of AT use.

Citing Articles

The value of privacy for people with dementia.

Buhr E, Schweda M Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15:1437813.

PMID: 39872432 PMC: 11770680. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437813.


What can the citations of systematic reviews of ethical literature tell us about their use?-an explorative empirical analysis of 31 reviews.

Nobile H, Moshtaghin N, Luddecke Z, Schnarr A, Mertz M Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):173.

PMID: 37740244 PMC: 10517474. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02341-y.


Mapping ethical issues in the use of smart home health technologies to care for older persons: a systematic review.

Felber N, Tian Y, Pageau F, Elger B, Wangmo T BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):24.

PMID: 36991423 PMC: 10061702. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00898-w.


Socio-technical context for insertable devices.

Heffernan K, Vetere F, Chang S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:991345.

PMID: 36478943 PMC: 9721116. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991345.


Evidence and User Considerations of Home Health Monitoring for Older Adults: Scoping Review.

Chan A, Cohen R, Robinson K, Bhardwaj D, Gregson G, Jutai J JMIR Aging. 2022; 5(4):e40079.

PMID: 36441572 PMC: 9745651. DOI: 10.2196/40079.