» Articles » PMID: 21494790

The D2 Antagonist Sulpiride Modulates the Neural Processing of Both Rewarding and Aversive Stimuli in Healthy Volunteers

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2011 Apr 16
PMID 21494790
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Animal studies indicate that dopamine pathways in the ventral striatum code for the motivational salience of both rewarding and aversive stimuli, but evidence for this mechanism in humans is less established. We have developed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) model which permits examination of the neural processing of both rewarding and aversive stimuli.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of the dopamine receptor antagonist, sulpiride, on the neural processing of rewarding and aversive stimuli in healthy volunteers.

Methods: We studied 30 healthy participants who were randomly allocated to receive a single dose of sulpiride (400 mg) or placebo, in a double-blind, parallel-group design. We used fMRI to measure the neural response to rewarding (taste or sight of chocolate) and aversive stimuli (sight of mouldy strawberries or unpleasant strawberry taste) 4 h after drug treatment.

Results: Relative to placebo, sulpiride reduced blood oxygenation level-dependent responses to chocolate stimuli in the striatum (ventral striatum) and anterior cingulate cortex. Sulpiride also reduced lateral orbitofrontal cortex and insula activations to the taste and sight of the aversive condition.

Conclusions: These results suggest that acute dopamine receptor blockade modulates mesolimbic and mesocortical neural activations in response to both rewarding and aversive stimuli in healthy volunteers. This effect may be relevant to the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists in the treatment of psychosis and may also have implications for the possible antidepressant properties of sulpiride.

Citing Articles

Striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor regulation of human reward processing and behaviour.

Osugo M, Wall M, Selvaggi P, Zahid U, Finelli V, Chapman G Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1852.

PMID: 39984436 PMC: 11845780. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56663-7.


Dopamine has no direct causal role in the formation of treatment expectations and placebo analgesia in humans.

Kunkel A, Asan L, Kruger I, Erfurt C, Ruhnau L, Caliskan E PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(9):e3002772.

PMID: 39316644 PMC: 11421806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002772.


Effects of dopamine and opioid receptor antagonism on the neural processing of social and nonsocial rewards.

Massaccesi C, Korb S, Gotzendorfer S, Chiappini E, Willeit M, Lundstrom J Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(4):e26645.

PMID: 38445523 PMC: 10915723. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26645.


Effects of a single dose of amisulpride on functional brain changes during reward- and motivation-related processing using task-based fMRI in healthy subjects and patients with major depressive disorder - study protocol for a randomized clinical....

Carstens L, Popp M, Keicher C, Hertrampf R, Weigner D, Meiering M Trials. 2023; 24(1):761.

PMID: 38012795 PMC: 10683198. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07788-x.


Neuromolecular Underpinnings of Negative Cognitive Bias in Depression.

Noworyta K, Cieslik A, Rygula R Cells. 2021; 10(11).

PMID: 34831380 PMC: 8621066. DOI: 10.3390/cells10113157.


References
1.
McCabe C, Cowen P, Harmer C . Neural representation of reward in recovered depressed patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009; 205(4):667-77. PMC: 2718193. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1573-9. View

2.
Horder J, Harmer C, Cowen P, McCabe C . Reduced neural response to reward following 7 days treatment with the cannabinoid CB1 antagonist rimonabant in healthy volunteers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010; 13(8):1103-13. DOI: 10.1017/S1461145710000453. View

3.
Maia T, Frank M . From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(2):154-62. PMC: 4408000. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2723. View

4.
Lewis D . Neural circuitry of the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995; 52(4):269-73; discussion 277-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950160019004. View

5.
Rolls E, Kringelbach M, de Araujo I . Different representations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 18(3):695-703. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02779.x. View