» Articles » PMID: 21494397

Ixabepilone As Monotherapy or in Combination with Capecitabine for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2011 Apr 16
PMID 21494397
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast Cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the world with 4.4 million survivors up to 5 years following the diagnosis.1 In the US alone approximately forty thousand women die annually of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite many effective systemic treatment options approximately 50% of women with MBC succumb to the disease within 24 months of the diagnosis.2 Ixabepilone is a novel, first in class member of the epothilone class of antineoplastic agents. Ixabepilone is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in patients whose tumors are resistant or refractory to anthracyclines, taxanes, and Capecitabine. Ixabepilone is also indicated in combination with Capecitabine for the treatment of patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer resistant to treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane, or whose cancer is taxane resistant and for whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. Ixabepilone was extensively studied as a single agent in patients with MBC and was found to be effective and well tolerated with a predictable and manageable safety profile. Not surprisingly prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes affects significantly the potential for response to therapy with single agent Ixabepilone in metastatic setting. MBC patients with taxane resistant MBC have objective response rate (RR) of 12%, patients with prior low exposure to taxanes and/or resistance RR = 22%, Ixabepilone treatment after adjuvant anthracycline therapy exposure renders RR = 42% and in Taxane naïve patients RR = 57%. In two large phase III studies of Ixabepilone + Capecitabine versus Capecitabine alone, progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (RR) were higher in the combination treatment arms, but no survival advantage was seen overall. Treatment with Ixabepilone + Capecitabine in a phase II study resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 23% in ER/PR/HER2 negative, triple-negative breast cancer patients (TNBC) while ORR of 31% was seen in a preplanned pooled analysis of TNBC in the phase III trials of Ixabepilone + Capecitabine. Significantly prolonged median PFS was seen for TNBC treated with the combination of Ixabepilone + Capecitabine compared to Capecitabine alone 4.2 vs. 1.7 months respectively. Ixabepilone as single agent appears to show excellent antitumor activity in patients with TNBC MBC. Addition of Ixabepilone to Capecitabine results in approximately doubling in median PFS for TNBC versus Capecitabine alone. Single agent Ixabepilone is generally well tolerated, and its toxicity profile does not overlap with that of Capecitabine and therefore depending on prior exposure to chemotherapy both single agent Ixabepilone or in combination with Capecitabine can be used safely and effectively for treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Oral Etoposide Combined With Capecitabine for Patients With Postoperative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Anthracycline/Taxanes.

Chen X, He Y, Fan T, Wei Y Thorac Cancer. 2025; 16(3):e70003.

PMID: 39901856 PMC: 11791407. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.70003.


Efficacy and safety of utidelone for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have failed standard second-line treatment: A phase 2 clinical trial (BG01-1801).

Shi Y, Chen G, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Lin L Cancer Pathog Ther. 2024; 2(2):103-111.

PMID: 38601485 PMC: 11002752. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpt.2023.10.006.


Synergistic binding of actinomycin D and echinomycin to DNA mismatch sites and their combined anti-tumour effects.

Satange R, Chang C, Li L, Lin S, Neidle S, Hou M Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(8):3540-3555.

PMID: 36919604 PMC: 10164580. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad156.


Inhibit or Evade Multidrug Resistance P-Glycoprotein in Cancer Treatment.

Waghray D, Zhang Q J Med Chem. 2017; 61(12):5108-5121.

PMID: 29251920 PMC: 6281405. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01457.


Antitumor activity of Cetuximab in combination with Ixabepilone on triple negative breast cancer stem cells.

Tanei T, Choi D, Rodriguez A, Liang D, Dobrolecki L, Ghosh M Breast Cancer Res. 2016; 18(1):6.

PMID: 26757880 PMC: 4711100. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0662-4.


References
1.
Yardley D . Proactive management of adverse events maintains the clinical benefit of ixabepilone. Oncologist. 2009; 14(5):448-55. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0284. View

2.
Pegram M, Konecny G, OCallaghan C, Beryt M, Pietras R, Slamon D . Rational combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96(10):739-49. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh131. View

3.
Abraham J, Agrawal M, Bakke S, Rutt A, Edgerly M, Balis F . Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-247550, an epothilone B analog, administered intravenously on a daily schedule for five days. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(9):1866-73. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.063. View

4.
Vogel C, Cobleigh M, Tripathy D, Gutheil J, Harris L, Fehrenbacher L . Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(3):719-26. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719. View

5.
Perez E, Patel T, Moreno-Aspitia A . Efficacy of ixabepilone in ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 121(2):261-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0824-0. View