» Articles » PMID: 21494361

Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Kyphoplasty

Overview
Date 2011 Apr 16
PMID 21494361
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The author measured levels of fluoroscopic radiation exposure to the surgeon's body based on the different beam directions during kyphoplasty.

Methods: This is an observational study. A series of 84 patients (96 vertebral bodies) were treated with kyphoplasty over one year. The patients were divided into four groups based on the horizontal and vertical directions of the X-Ray beams. We measured radiation exposure with the seven dosimetry badges which were worn by the surgeon in each group (total of 28 badges). Twenty-four procedures were measured in each group. Cumulative dose and dose rates were compared between groups.

Results: Fluoroscopic radiation is received by the operator in real-time for approximately 50% (half) of the operation time. Thyroid protectors and lead aprons can block radiation almost completely. The largest dose was received in the chest irrespective of beam directions. The lowest level of radiation were received when X-ray tube was away from the surgeon and beneath the bed (dose rate of head, neck, chest, abdomen and knee : 0.2986, 0.2828, 0.9711, 0.8977, 0.8168 mSv, respectively). The radiation differences between each group were approximately 2.7-10 folds.

Conclusion: When fluoroscopic guided-KP is performed, the X-Ray tube should be positioned on the opposite side of the operator and below the table, otherwise the received radiation to the surgeon's body would be 2.7-10 times higher than such condition.

Citing Articles

Niche preclinical and clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging with endogenous contrast.

John S, Hester S, Basij M, Paul A, Xavierselvan M, Mehrmohammadi M Photoacoustics. 2023; 32:100533.

PMID: 37636547 PMC: 10448345. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100533.


Reduction of Radiation Exposure by Modifying Imaging Manner and Fluoroscopic Settings during Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.

Kim H, Park E, Lee S, Park C, Chung S J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021; 64(6):933-943.

PMID: 34420290 PMC: 8590905. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0338.


Radiation exposure to the surgeon during minimally invasive spine procedures is directly estimated by patient dose.

Farber S, Nayar G, Desai R, Reiser E, Byrd S, Chi D Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(8):1911-1917.

PMID: 29948320 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5653-6.


Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.

Smith J, Marsh R, Silosky M Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 47(1):37-43.

PMID: 28821928 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2756-9.


Radiation dose to the operator during fluoroscopically guided spine procedures.

Roccatagliata L, Presilla S, Pravata E, Cianfoni A Neuroradiology. 2017; 59(9):885-892.

PMID: 28721441 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-017-1868-1.


References
1.
Seibert J . Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: do fluoroscopy operators know about radiation dose, and should they want to know?. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):633-4. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323040968. View

2.
Synowitz M, Kiwit J . Surgeon's radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 4(2):106-9. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.106. View

3.
Mahesh M . Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics. 2001; 21(4):1033-45. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl271033. View

4.
Kallmes D, O E, Roy S, Piccolo R, Marx W, Lee J . Radiation dose to the operator during vertebroplasty: prospective comparison of the use of 1-cc syringes versus an injection device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(6):1257-60. PMC: 8149000. View

5.
Mehdizade A, Lovblad K, Wilhelm K, Somon T, Wetzel S, Kelekis A . Radiation dose in vertebroplasty. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46(3):243-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-003-1156-0. View