» Articles » PMID: 21493028

Positive Enteric Contrast Material for Abdominal and Pelvic CT with Automatic Exposure Control: What is the Effect on Patient Radiation Exposure?

Overview
Journal Eur J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Apr 16
PMID 21493028
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of positive enteric contrast administration on automatic exposure control (AEC) CT radiation exposure in (1) a CT phantom, and (2) a retrospective review of patients.

Materials And Methods: We scanned a CT phantom containing simulated bowel that was sequentially filled with water and positive enteric contrast, and recorded the mean volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). We also identified 17 patients who had undergone 2 technically comparable CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis, one with positive enteric contrast and the other with oral water. Paired Student's t-tests were used to compare the mean CTDIvol between scans performed with and without positive enteric contrast. Both the phantom and patient CT scans were performed using AEC with a fixed noise index.

Results: The mean CTDIvol for the phantom with simulated bowel containing water and positive enteric contrast were 8.2 ± 0.2 mGy, and 8.7 ± 0.1 mGy (6.1% higher than water, p=0.02), respectively. The mean CTDIvol for patients scanned with oral water and with positive enteric contrast were 11.8 mGy and 13.1 mGy, respectively (p=0.003). This corresponded to a mean CTDIvol which was 11.0% higher (range: 0.0-20.7% higher) in scans with positive enteric contrast than those with oral water in patients.

Conclusions: When automatic exposure control is utilized for abdominopelvic CT, the radiation exposure, as measured by CTDIvol, is higher for scans performed with positive enteric contrast than those with oral water.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan with oral and intravenous contrast versus CT scan with intravenous contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma.

Golikhatir I, Sazgar M, Jahanian F, Mousavi Amiri S, Aminiahidashti H Chin J Traumatol. 2023; 26(3):174-177.

PMID: 36631309 PMC: 10244241. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.12.006.


Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT.

Sheafor D, Kovacs M, Burchett P, Picard M, Davis B, Hardie A Radiol Med. 2018; 123(12):918-925.

PMID: 30084109 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0928-x.


Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks.

Kaplan S, Magill D, Felice M, Xiao R, Ali S, Zhu X Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 48(2):227-234.

PMID: 29046919 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3996-5.


Utility of CT oral contrast administration in the emergency department of a quaternary oncology hospital: diagnostic implications, turnaround times, and assessment of ED physician ordering.

Jensen C, Blair K, Le O, Sun J, Wei W, Rao Korivi B Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(11):2760-2768.

PMID: 28523416 PMC: 5641226. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1175-7.


Effects of oral contrast on dose in abdominopelvic computed tomography with pure iterative reconstruction.

Murphy K, Healy L, Crush L, Twomey M, Moloney F, Sexton S World J Radiol. 2016; 8(9):809-815.

PMID: 27721943 PMC: 5039676. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809.


References
1.
Rizzo S, Kalra M, Maher M, Blake M, Toth T, Saini S . Do metallic endoprostheses increase radiation dose associated with automatic tube-current modulation in abdominal-pelvic MDCT? A phantom and patient study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(2):491-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840491. View

2.
Coakley F, Gould R, Yeh B, Arenson R . CT radiation dose: what can you do right now in your practice?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 196(3):619-25. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5043. View

3.
Seymour C, Pryor J, Gupta R, Schwab C . Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast for computed tomography. J Trauma. 2004; 57(5):1105-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000133578.57031.97. View

4.
Lim H, Lee K, Kim S, Kim K, Kim B, Lee H . Does the amount of tagged stool and fluid significantly affect the radiation exposure in low-dose CT colonography performed with an automatic exposure control?. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(2):345-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1922-4. View

5.
Halsted M, Racadio J, Emery K, Kreymerman P, Poe S, Bean J . Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182(6):1555-9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821555. View