» Articles » PMID: 21489193

Learning Regions of Interest from Low Level Maps in Virtual Microscopy

Overview
Journal Diagn Pathol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pathology
Date 2011 Apr 15
PMID 21489193
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Virtual microscopy can improve the workflow of modern pathology laboratories, a goal limited by the large size of the virtual slides (VS). Lately, determination of the Regions of Interest has shown to be useful in navigation and compression tasks. This work presents a novel method for establishing RoIs in VS, based on a relevance score calculated from example images selected by pathologist. The process starts by splitting the Virtual Slide (VS) into a grid of blocks, each represented by a set of low level features which aim to capture the very basic visual properties, namely, color, intensity, orientation and texture. The expert selects then two blocks i.e. A typical relevant (irrelevant) instance. Different similarity (disimilarity) maps are then constructed, using these positive (negative) examples. The obtained maps are then integrated by a normalization process that promotes maps with a similarity global maxima that largely exceeds the average local maxima. Each image region is thus entailed with an associated score, established by the number of closest positive (negative) blocks, whereby any block has also an associated score. Evaluation was carried out using 8 VS from different tissues, upon which a group of three pathologists had navigated. Precision-recall measurements were calculated at each step of any actual navigation, obtaining an average precision of 55% and a recall of about 38% when using the available set of navigations.

Citing Articles

Applications of discriminative and deep learning feature extraction methods for whole slide image analysis: A survey.

Al-Thelaya K, Gilal N, Alzubaidi M, Majeed F, Agus M, Schneider J J Pathol Inform. 2023; 14:100335.

PMID: 37928897 PMC: 10622844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100335.


Multiplex Immunofluorescence and the Digital Image Analysis Workflow for Evaluation of the Tumor Immune Environment in Translational Research.

Rojas F, Hernandez S, Lazcano R, Laberiano-Fernandez C, Parra E Front Oncol. 2022; 12:889886.

PMID: 35832550 PMC: 9271766. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889886.


Localization of Diagnostically Relevant Regions of Interest in Whole Slide Images: a Comparative Study.

Mercan E, Aksoy S, Shapiro L, Weaver D, Brunye T, Elmore J J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29(4):496-506.

PMID: 26961982 PMC: 4942394. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9873-1.


Fast segmentation of stained nuclei in terabyte-scale, time resolved 3D microscopy image stacks.

Stegmaier J, Otte J, Kobitski A, Bartschat A, Garcia A, Nienhaus G PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e90036.

PMID: 24587204 PMC: 3937404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090036.


Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images.

Kothari S, Phan J, Stokes T, Wang M J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(6):1099-108.

PMID: 23959844 PMC: 3822114. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001540.


References
1.
Iregui M, Gomez F, Romero E . Strategies for efficient virtual microscopy in pathological samples using JPEG2000. Micron. 2007; 38(7):700-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2007.04.008. View

2.
Itti L, Koch C . Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(3):194-203. DOI: 10.1038/35058500. View

3.
Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Deschamps T, Idica A, Malladi R, de Solorzano C . Automatic segmentation of histological structures in mammary gland tissue sections. J Biomed Opt. 2004; 9(3):444-53. DOI: 10.1117/1.1699011. View

4.
Pena G, de Souza Andrade-Filho J . How does a pathologist make a diagnosis?. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009; 133(1):124-32. DOI: 10.5858/133.1.124. View

5.
Karacali B, Tozeren A . Automated detection of regions of interest for tissue microarray experiments: an image texture analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 2007; 7:2. PMC: 1838905. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-7-2. View