» Articles » PMID: 21482588

Partner Caregiving in Older Cohabiting Couples

Overview
Date 2011 Apr 13
PMID 21482588
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Despite the rapidly increasing prevalence of cohabitation among older adults, the caregiving literature has exclusively focused on formally married individuals. Extending prior work on intra-couple care, this study contrasts frail cohabitors' patterns of care receipt from a partner to that of frail spouses.

Methods: Using nationally representative panel data from the Health and Retirement Study (2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006), we estimate random effects cross-sectional times series models predicting frail cohabitors' likelihood of receiving partner care compared with their married counterparts'. Conditional on the receipt of intra-couple care, we also examine differences in marital and nonmarital partners' caregiving hours and caregiving involvement relative to other helpers.

Results: Net of sociodemographic, disability, and comorbidity factors, we find that cohabitors are less likely to receive partner care than married individuals. However, caregiving nonmarital partners provide as many hours of care as spouses while providing a substantially larger share of disabled respondents' care than marital partners.

Discussion: Cohabitation and marriage have distinct implications for older adults' patterns of partner care receipt. This study adds weight to a growing body of research emphasizing the importance of accounting for older adults' nontraditional union forms and of examining the ramifications of cohabitation for older adults' well-being.

Citing Articles

Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury.

Donato Z, Levy A, Sneij A, LaVela S, Berg A, Shapiro L Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025; 31(1):66-76.

PMID: 40008158 PMC: 11848133. DOI: 10.46292/sci24-00028.


Changes in Family Structure and Increasing Care Gaps in the United States, 2015-2050.

Wu H, Margolis R, Verdery A, Patterson S Demography. 2024; 61(5):1403-1426.

PMID: 39259138 PMC: 11629368. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-11551558.


Use of professional home care in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

Wagner A, Brach M, Scheel-Sailer A, Friedli M, Hund-Georgiadis M, Jordan X BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1393.

PMID: 38087349 PMC: 10714621. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10429-3.


Relationship Status-Based Health Disparities during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Thomeer M Soc Curr. 2023; 10(1):17-40.

PMID: 37379448 PMC: 9111917. DOI: 10.1177/23294965221099185.


The impact of hearing loss on trajectories of depressive symptoms in married couples.

West J, Smith S, Dupre M Soc Sci Med. 2023; 321:115780.

PMID: 36801754 PMC: 10478395. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115780.


References
1.
Freedman V, Aykan H, Wolf D, Marcotte J . Disability and home care dynamics among older unmarried Americans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 59(1):S25-33. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/59.1.s25. View

2.
Langa K, Chernew M, Kabeto M, Herzog A, Ofstedal M, Willis R . National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(11):770-8. PMC: 1495283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10123.x. View

3.
Brown S, Kawamura S . Relationship quality among cohabitors and marrieds in older adulthood. Soc Sci Res. 2014; 39(5):777-786. PMC: 4224292. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.010. View

4.
Ingersoll-Dayton B, Antonucci T . Reciprocal and nonreciprocal social support: contrasting sides of intimate relationships. J Gerontol. 1988; 43(3):S65-73. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/43.3.s65. View

5.
Katz S, Kabeto M, Langa K . Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States. JAMA. 2000; 284(23):3022-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3022. View