» Articles » PMID: 21476666

Auditory Discrimination of Force of Impact

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2011 Apr 12
PMID 21476666
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The auditory discrimination of force of impact was measured for three groups of listeners using sounds synthesized according to first-order equations of motion for the homogenous, isotropic bar [Morse and Ingard (1968). Theoretical Acoustics pp. 175-191]. The three groups were professional percussionists, nonmusicians, and individuals recruited from the general population without regard to musical background. In the two-interval, forced-choice procedure, listeners chose the sound corresponding to the greater force of impact as the length of the bar varied from one presentation to the next. From the equations of motion, a maximum-likelihood test for the task was determined to be of the form Δlog A + αΔ log f > 0, where A and f are the amplitude and frequency of any one partial and α = 0.5. Relative decision weights on Δ log f were obtained from the trial-by-trial responses of listeners and compared to α. Percussionists generally outperformed the other groups; however, the obtained decision weights of all listeners deviated significantly from α and showed variability within groups far in excess of the variability associated with replication. Providing correct feedback after each trial had little effect on the decision weights. The variability in these measures was comparable to that seen in studies involving the auditory discrimination of other source attributes.

Citing Articles

Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction.

Fischenich A, Hots J, Verhey J, Guldan J, Oberfeld D PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261001.

PMID: 34941913 PMC: 8699981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261001.


Temporal Loudness Weights Are Frequency Specific.

Fischenich A, Hots J, Verhey J, Oberfeld D Front Psychol. 2021; 12:588571.

PMID: 33815193 PMC: 8017310. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588571.


Adaptive Efficient Coding of Correlated Acoustic Properties.

Lu K, Liu W, Dutta K, Zan P, Fritz J, Shamma S J Neurosci. 2019; 39(44):8664-8678.

PMID: 31519821 PMC: 6820201. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0141-19.2019.


Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Gockel H, Alsindi S, Hardy C, Carlyon R J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017; 18(6):803-813.

PMID: 28755308 PMC: 5688044. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0636-6.


The dominance of haptics over audition in controlling wrist velocity during striking movements.

Cao Y, Giordano B, Avanzini F, McAdams S Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234(4):1145-58.

PMID: 26790425 PMC: 4785215. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4529-9.


References
1.
Lakatos S, McAdams S, CAUSSE R . The representation of auditory source characteristics: simple geometric form. Percept Psychophys. 1997; 59(8):1180-90. DOI: 10.3758/bf03214206. View

2.
Stoelinga C, Lutfi R . Modeling manner of contact in the synthesis of impact sounds for perceptual research. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130(2):EL62-8. PMC: 3155581. DOI: 10.1121/1.3609919. View

3.
Turvey M . Hearing shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000; 26(1):279-94. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.279. View

4.
Giordano B, Rocchesso D, McAdams S . Integration of acoustical information in the perception of impacted sound sources: the role of information accuracy and exploitability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 36(2):462-76. DOI: 10.1037/a0018388. View

5.
Lutfi R, Oh E . Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck-clamped bar. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 102(6):3647-56. DOI: 10.1121/1.420151. View