» Articles » PMID: 21475446

Comparison of Serological and Nucleic Acid Based Assays Used to Diagnose Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection in Acute and Chronic Liver Diseases

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Apr 9
PMID 21475446
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study reports a comparative diagnostic potential of three different assay systems used to detect HCV infection in acute and chronic liver diseases.

Methods: A total number of 364 patients with various types of liver diseases were analyzed for hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen using Enzyme Immuno Assay (EIA), HCV-RNA by RT-PCR and anti-HCV antibodies by third generation EIA system. Simultaneously these patients were also tested for markers of other hepatitis viruses, notably, hepatitis A, B, C, D and E. In some cases, even transfusion transmitted virus (TTV) was tested using TTV-DNA as the marker of TTV infection.

Results: Analysis of results demonstrated the presence of hepatitis B, C and E in different proportions of patients belonging to these liver diseases. Hepatitis A and D infections could not be detected in these cases TTV infection was prevalent in different liver diseases in different proportions. Though none of control sera demonstrated hepatitis A-E infection, however, TTV infection was noted in control group also. When we analysed all the sera for HCV infection using these different assay systems, we found HCV core, HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies in 18.3%, 18.3% and 5.83% cases of acute viral hepatitis (AVH), 13.3 %, 13.3% and 46.6% cases of chronic viral hepatitis (CVH), 23.8%, 23.8% and 23.8% cases with cirrhosis of liver and 20%, 17.5% and 10% cases respectively, of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) patients. Whereas HCV core and HCV-RNA assays were comparable and predominantly positive in acute cases (AVH and FHF), anti-HCV antibodies were detected in high proportions in chronic liver diseases. Cirrhosis patients showed all the markers in equal proportions. This pattern of HCV markers remains unaffected by co-infection of HCV with other hepatitis viral infections.

Conclusion: In conclusion, where HCV core and HCV-RNA are best diagnostic markers in acute liver diseases, anti-HCV diagnoses high proportion of HCV cases in chronic liver diseases. This diagnostic pattern is not changed on co-infection of HCV with other viral infections.

Citing Articles

Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among health care providers in an Egyptian university hospital: different diagnostic modalities.

El-Sokkary R, Tash R, Meawed T, El Seifi O, Mortada E Infect Drug Resist. 2017; 10:357-364.

PMID: 29270026 PMC: 5655154. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S145844.

References
1.
Arduino J, Stuver S, Spiegelman D, Okayama A, Tabor E, Yu M . Assessment of markers of hepatitis C virus infection in a Japanese adult population. J Infect Dis. 2001; 184(10):1229-35. DOI: 10.1086/324006. View

2.
Ruff A, Guarnieri F, Siliciano R, August J . The enhanced immune response to the HIV gp160/LAMP chimeric gene product targeted to the lysosome membrane protein trafficking pathway. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272(13):8671-8. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.13.8671. View

3.
Lorenzo J, Castro A, Aguilera A, Prieto E, Lopez-Calvo S, Regueiro B . Total HCV core antigen assay. A new marker of HCV viremia and its application during treatment of chronic hepatitis C. J Virol Methods. 2004; 120(2):173-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.05.002. View

4.
Simmonds P . Viral heterogeneity of the hepatitis C virus. J Hepatol. 2000; 31 Suppl 1:54-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80375-4. View

5.
Poynard T, Yuen M, Ratziu V, Lai C . Viral hepatitis C. Lancet. 2003; 362(9401):2095-100. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15109-4. View