» Articles » PMID: 21470611

Stabilizing and Destabilizing Forces in the Nursing Work Environment: a Qualitative Study on Turnover Intention

Overview
Journal Int J Nurs Stud
Specialty Nursing
Date 2011 Apr 8
PMID 21470611
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The nursing work environment, which provides the context of care delivery, has been gaining increasing attention in recent years. A growing body of evidence points to an inseparable link between attributes of the nursing work environment and nurse and patient outcomes. While most studies have adopted a survey design to examine the workforce and work environment issues, this study employed a phenomenological approach to provide empirical evidence regarding nurses' perceptions of their work and work environment.

Aim: The aim of this study was to advance our understanding of the phenomenon of increasing nurse turnover through exploring frontline registered nurses' lived experiences of working in Hong Kong public hospitals.

Methods And Participants: A modified version of Van Kaam's controlled explication method was adopted. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 frontline nurses recruited from ten acute regional, district and non-acute public hospitals in Hong Kong. Their perspectives in regard to their work and work environment, such as workload, manpower demand and professional values, were extensively examined, and a hypothetical description relating the nursing work environment with nurses' turnover intention was posited.

Results: Contemplation of nurses' experiences revealed the vulnerable aspects of nursing work and six essential constituents of the nursing work environment, namely staffing level, work responsibility, management, co-worker relationships, job, and professional incentives. These essential constituents have contributed to two sets of forces, stabilizing and destabilizing forces, which originate from the attributes of the nursing work environment. Nurses viewed harmonious co-worker relationships, recognition and professional development as the crucial retaining factors. However, nurses working in an unfavorable environment were overwhelmed by destabilizing forces; they expressed frustration and demonstrated an intention to leave their work environment.

Conclusions: The nursing work environment is a complex entity comprising multiple constituents; its attributes affect nurses' perceptions of their work and work environment, which warrant special attention in addressing the phenomenon of increasing nurse turnover.

Citing Articles

Individual perspectives and mental maps of working conditions and intention to stay of physicians in academic medicine.

Hasebrook J, Hecke J, Volkert T, Singer M, Hinkelmann J, Michalak L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1106501.

PMID: 37251059 PMC: 10213555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106501.


Working environment of nurses in public referral hospitals of West Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021.

Kassahun C, Abate A, Tezera Z, Beshah D, Agegnehu C, Getnet M BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):167.

PMID: 35751081 PMC: 9229886. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00944-9.


The nursing work environment and quality of care: Content analysis of comments made by registered nurses responding to the Essentials of Magnetism II scale.

Oshodi T, Bruneau B, Crockett R, Kinchington F, Nayar S, West E Nurs Open. 2019; 6(3):878-888.

PMID: 31367411 PMC: 6650677. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.268.


Adequate Resources as Essential Component in the Nursing Practice Environment: A Qualitative Study.

Rivaz M, Momennasab M, Yektatalab S, Ebadi A J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(6):IC01-IC04.

PMID: 28764196 PMC: 5535389. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25349.9986.


Professional nurses' perceptions and experiences with the implementation of an integrated chronic care model at primary healthcare clinics in South Africa.

Mahomed O, Asmall S Curationis. 2017; 40(1):e1-e6.

PMID: 28582981 PMC: 6091616. DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v40i1.1708.


References
1.
Currie V, Harvey G, West E, McKenna H, Keeney S . Relationship between quality of care, staffing levels, skill mix and nurse autonomy: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 51(1):73-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03462.x. View

2.
Armstrong K, Laschinger H . Structural empowerment, Magnet hospital characteristics, and patient safety culture: making the link. J Nurs Care Qual. 2006; 21(2):124-32, quiz 133-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001786-200604000-00007. View

3.
Harrington C, Kovner C, Mezey M, Burger S, Mohler M, Burke R . Experts recommend minimum nurse staffing standards for nursing facilities in the United States. Gerontologist. 2000; 40(1):5-16. DOI: 10.1093/geront/40.1.5. View

4.
. A content analysis of staff nurse descriptions of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 29(6):1332-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01018.x. View

5.
van der Heijden B, Kummerling A, van Dam K, van der Schoot E, Estryn-Behar M, Hasselhorn H . The impact of social support upon intention to leave among female nurses in Europe: secondary analysis of data from the NEXT survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 47(4):434-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.004. View