» Articles » PMID: 21468646

Sagittal Balance of Thoracic Lordoscoliosis: Anterior Dual Rod Instrumentation Versus Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Apr 7
PMID 21468646
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Posterior pedicle screw fixation is now the standard treatment for surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and has largely replaced anterior techniques, but there have been reports describing a lordogenic effect of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in the thoracic spine. This clinical study compared anterior dual rod instrumentation with posterior pedicle screw fixation for idiopathic thoracic lordoscoliosis, including 42 patients (7 male, 35 female; average age 16 years, range 12-34) who underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation (n = 20) or anterior dual rod instrumentation (n = 22) at two centers. The average follow-up period was 33 months (24-108 months). Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a structural thoracic curve (Lenke 1-3) and thoracic hypokyphosis (T4-T12 < 20°). The main thoracic curve magnitude and sagittal profile on standing radiographs were evaluated. Thoracic kyphosis was significantly restored from preoperatively 10.2° to 23.4° postoperatively in the anterior group and from 7.6° to 12.9° in the posterior group (P < 0.005). Kyphosis improved significantly better in the anterior group than in the posterior group (P < 0.005). The preoperative and postoperative main thoracic curve values were 63° (48-80°) and 25.2° in the anterior group and 60.6° (50-88°) and 23.6° in the posterior group, with no significant differences between the groups. No neurological or other severe complications were observed. Anterior dual rod instrumentation in patients with thoracic lordoscoliosis allows significantly better restoration of thoracic kyphosis than posterior pedicle screw instrumentation.

Citing Articles

Intermittent pedicle screw application provides better kyphosis restoration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis for Lenke type 1 and type 2 curves.

Baymurat A, Yapar A, Kilicaslan O, Tokgoz M, Selcuk H, Yas S Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(6):2213-2220.

PMID: 37010609 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07669-6.


Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Tailor made management of thoracic scoliosis with cervical hyperextension in muscular dystrophy" by A. Angelliaume et al. (Eur Spine J; 2017: doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5113-8).

Bullmann V Eur Spine J. 2017; 27(2):270-271.

PMID: 28601993 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5169-5.


Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of fusion segments and radiological outcomes.

Luo M, Wang W, Shen M, Xia L J Orthop Surg Res. 2016; 11(1):77.

PMID: 27401875 PMC: 4940871. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0415-9.


The Universal Clamp hybrid system: a safe technique to correct deformity and restore kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

La Rosa G, Giglio G, Oggiano L Eur Spine J. 2013; 22 Suppl 6:S823-8.

PMID: 24052403 PMC: 3830027. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3014-z.


Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system.

Ilharreborde B, Sebag G, Skalli W, Mazda K Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(11):2382-91.

PMID: 23580058 PMC: 3886523. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2776-7.


References
1.
Sucato D, Agrawal S, OBrien M, Lowe T, Richards S, Lenke L . Restoration of thoracic kyphosis after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(24):2630-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181880498. View

2.
Vora V, Crawford A, Babekhir N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lenke L, Peskin M . A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(17):1869-74. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b912. View

3.
Lenke L, Newton P, Marks M, Blanke K, Sides B, Kim Y . Prospective pulmonary function comparison of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(18):2055-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138274.09504.38. View

4.
Kim Y, Lenke L, Cho S, Bridwell K, Sides B, Blanke K . Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(18):2040-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138268.12324.1a. View

5.
Winter R, Lonstein J, Denis F . How much correction is enough?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(24):2641-3. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5207. View