» Articles » PMID: 21468009

Feasibility and Yield of Screening in Relatives from Familial Pancreatic Cancer Families

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 Apr 7
PMID 21468009
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease. Over 80% of patients are found to have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Strategies to improve disease-specific outcome include identification and early detection of precursor lesions or early cancers in high-risk groups. In this study, we investigate whether screening at-risk relatives of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) patients is safe and has significant yield.

Methods: We enrolled 309 asymptomatic at-risk relatives into our Familial Pancreatic Tumor Registry (FPTR) and offered them screening with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticogram (MRCP) followed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration if indicated. Relatives with findings were referred for surgical evaluation.

Results: As of 1 August 2009, 109 relatives had completed at least one cycle of screening. Abnormal radiographic findings were present on initial screening in 18/109 patients (16.5%), 15 of whom underwent EUS. A significant abnormality was confirmed in 9 of 15 patients, 6 of whom ultimately had surgery for an overall diagnostic yield of 8.3% (9/109). Yield was greatest in relatives >65 years old (35%, 6/17) when compared with relatives 55-65 years (3%, 1/31) and relatives <55 years (3%, 2/61).

Conclusions: Screening at-risk relatives from FPC families has a significant diagnostic yield, particularly in relatives >65 years of age, confirming prior studies. MRCP as initial screening modality is safe and effective.

Citing Articles

Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.

Bogdanski A, van Hooft J, Boekestijn B, Bonsing B, Wasser M, Klatte D Fam Cancer. 2024; 23(3):323-339.

PMID: 38619782 PMC: 11255004. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1.


Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Among High-Risk Populations.

Peters M, Eckel A, Seguin C, Davidi B, Howard D, Knudsen A JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 20(2):278-290.

PMID: 38086003 PMC: 10911581. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00495.


Screening for pancreatic cancer has the potential to save lives, but is it practical?.

Mazer B, Lee J, Roberts N, Chu L, Lennon A, Klein A Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 17(6):555-574.

PMID: 37212770 PMC: 10424088. DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2217354.


Clinical and Molecular Attributes and Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.

Raut P, Nimmakayala R, Batra S, Ponnusamy M Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022; 1878(1):188851.

PMID: 36535512 PMC: 9898173. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188851.


Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.

Ardeshna D, Rangwani S, Cao T, Pawlik T, Stanich P, Krishna S Biomedicines. 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35884779 PMC: 9313108. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071475.


References
1.
Greer J, Whitcomb D . Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2006; 56(5):601-5. PMC: 1942153. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2006.101220. View

2.
Canto M, Goggins M, Yeo C, Griffin C, Axilbund J, Brune K . Screening for pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: an EUS-based approach. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2(7):606-21. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00244-7. View

3.
Ekbom A, McLaughlin J, Karlsson B, Nyren O, Gridley G, Adami H . Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 86(8):625-7. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.8.625. View

4.
Allen P . Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: putting a hump in survival. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205(4 Suppl):S76-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.331. View

5.
Greenhalf W, Malats N, Nilsson M, Bartsch D, Neoptolemos J . International registries of families at high risk of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2008; 8(6):558-65. DOI: 10.1159/000159214. View