» Articles » PMID: 21466959

Trans-catheter Valve-in-valve Implantation: in Vitro Hydrodynamic Performance of the SAPIEN+cloth Trans-catheter Heart Valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Valves

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Since 1990, over 1.2 million bioprosthetic valves were implanted for aortic stenosis. Given the risk of structural valve deterioration, the need to redo AVR will likely rise. Recently, SAPIEN valve-in-valve (ViV) has been advocated. We evaluated the in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the Edwards SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve (THV) implanted within the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) valve.

Methods: Both 23- and 26-mm Edwards SAPIEN+cloth THVs (Model 9000MIS) were deployed within 23- or 25-mm (1) CEP aortic bioprosthesis (Models 2700 and 2800), (2) CEP Magna (Model 3000), and (3) CEP plus pericardial mitral (Model 6900P), respectively. Tests included: (1) mean pressure gradient; (2) pulsatile effective orifice area (EOA); (3) regurgitant volume; (d) migration during accelerated wear testing (AWT; 20 million cycles @ 200mmHg); and (5) valve dislodgement pressure. Values tested per ISO 5840:2005 valve standards; mean±SD.

Results: Post-deployment pressure gradient across the combined valves ranges from 2.8±0.3 to 8.7±0.5mmHg. The post-deployment EOA of the valves ranged from 1.7±0.1 to 2.0±0.0cm(2). Pulsatile flow regurgitant volume ranged from 2.1±0.7 to 7.6±1.2ml. Migration during the AWT ranged from 0.01±0.27 to 1.61±0.92mm. Pressure increase during the tests to quantify migration ranged from >400 to >800mmHg.

Conclusions: Compared with the rigorous ISO 5840:2500 valve standards, the Edwards SAPIEN+cloth THV implanted ViV within the CEP valve demonstrated excellent hydrodynamic performance.

Citing Articles

Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Rotman O, Bianchi M, Ghosh R, Kovarovic B, Bluestein D Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018; 15(11):771-791.

PMID: 30318937 PMC: 6417919. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1536427.


Effect of severe bioprosthetic valve tissue ingrowth and inflow calcification on valve-in-valve performance.

Hatoum H, Dollery J, Lilly S, Crestanello J, Prasad Dasi L J Biomech. 2018; 74:171-179.

PMID: 29753455 PMC: 5977402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.039.


Thrombogenic potential of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with trivial paravalvular leakage.

Scotten L, Siegel R Ann Transl Med. 2014; 2(5):43.

PMID: 25333018 PMC: 4200687. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.05.04.


Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Colli A, Gallo M, Bernabeu E, DOnofrio A, Tarzia V, Gerosa G Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 1(2):156-9.

PMID: 23977486 PMC: 3741743. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.07.01.


A staged approach to transcatheter aortic valve implantation and mitral valve-in-valve implantation for a degenerated bioprosthesis in a high-risk patient.

Santarpino G, Fischlein T, Concistre G, Pfeiffer S Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012; 15(4):764-5.

PMID: 22753438 PMC: 3445372. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs286.