» Articles » PMID: 21461298

The Impact of HLA Matching on Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Korean Children

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2011 Apr 5
PMID 21461298
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The impact of HLA matching on outcomes of unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) varies in different racial or ethnic groups. Since little is known about the impact of such matching on URD HSCT in Korean children, we analyzed this issue.

Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of 142 patients who underwent URD HSCT at 4 Korean medical centers. All patient donor pairs were fully typed for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DR alleles.

Results: At a median follow-up of 22 months, 3-year survival rates for patients with 8, 7, and ≤6 matched alleles were 88.4%, 70.7%, and 53.6%, respectively. A single mismatch (Mm) at HLA-B or -C was associated with lower survival compared with that associated with 8 matched alleles. No significant differences were observed between single-allele and single-antigen Mms with respect to survival rate or acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) incidence rates. HLA disparity had a greater impact on the survival of patients with high-risk malignancy than of those with low-risk malignancy. Among pairs with a single Mm, only locus A showed a significant association and higher risk of grade III-IV aGVHD compared to those in patients with 8 matched alleles.

Conclusion: Disparity in HLA class I, regardless of antigen or allele Mm, adversely affected both survival and grade III-IV aGVHD development. An increased number of HLA Mms was associated with a higher risk of post-transplantation complications. Further investigations using larger cohorts are required to confirm the effects of HLA mismatching on URD HSCT patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

A walk through the development of human leukocyte antigen typing: from serologic techniques to next-generation sequencing.

Choi H, Choi E, Kim H, Baek I, Won A, Park S Clin Transplant Res. 2024; 38(4):294-308.

PMID: 39658458 PMC: 11732764. DOI: 10.4285/ctr.24.0055.


Clinical implications of HLA locus mismatching in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Tie R, Zhang T, Yang B, Fu H, Han B, Yu J Oncotarget. 2017; 8(16):27645-27660.

PMID: 28206973 PMC: 5432365. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15291.


Role of HLA in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Park M, Seo J Bone Marrow Res. 2012; 2012:680841.

PMID: 23082252 PMC: 3467756. DOI: 10.1155/2012/680841.


Shedding a new light on the HLA matching.

Jung H Korean J Hematol. 2011; 46(1):1-2.

PMID: 21461293 PMC: 3065618. DOI: 10.5045/kjh.2011.46.1.1.

References
1.
Lee S, Klein J, Haagenson M, Baxter-Lowe L, Confer D, Eapen M . High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 2007; 110(13):4576-83. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-097386. View

2.
Greinix H, Fae I, Schneider B, Rosenmayr A, Mitterschiffthaler A, Pelzmann B . Impact of HLA class I high-resolution mismatches on chronic graft-versus-host disease and survival of patients given hematopoietic stem cell grafts from unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004; 35(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704741. View

3.
Flomenberg N, Baxter-Lowe L, Confer D, Fernandez-Vina M, Filipovich A, Horowitz M . Impact of HLA class I and class II high-resolution matching on outcomes of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: HLA-C mismatching is associated with a strong adverse effect on transplantation outcome. Blood. 2004; 104(7):1923-30. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0803. View

4.
Petersdorf E, Anasetti C, Martin P, Gooley T, Radich J, Malkki M . Limits of HLA mismatching in unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2004; 104(9):2976-80. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1674. View

5.
Chalandon Y, Tiercy J, Schanz U, Gungor T, Seger R, Halter J . Impact of high-resolution matching in allogeneic unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in Switzerland. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 37(10):909-16. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705353. View