» Articles » PMID: 21460589

Measuring How People View Biomedical Research: Reliability and Validity Analysis of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2011 Apr 5
PMID 21460589
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With increasing numbers of studies on research ethics and a need to improve the recruitment of research subjects, the ability to measure attitudes toward biomedical research has become important. The Research Attitudes Questionnaire is a significant predictor of the public's attitudes toward and willingness to participate in research, yet limited data are available on its psychometric properties. This study establishes the scale's internal consistency and dimensionality using a large Internet-based sample from the United States. One item was removed due to a poor item-total correlation, and three additional items were removed which formed a reverse-wording measurement artifact factor. With improved internal consistency and dimensionality, the seven-item version has the advantages of shorter administration time and improved psychometric properties.

Citing Articles

Comparing research attitudes in Down syndrome and non-Down syndrome research decision-makers.

Lu T, Campos P, Leader S, Lee X, Xu H, Doran E Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024; 10(3):e12478.

PMID: 39086735 PMC: 11289724. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12478.


Communicating Alzheimer's biomarker results to cognitively unimpaired research participants: Satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes.

Erickson C, Ketchum F, Basche K, Chin N, Eveler M, Clark L Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024; 10(2):e12483.

PMID: 38882702 PMC: 11177175. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12483.


Ethnoracialized group differences in attitudes and knowledge about schizophrenia and willingness to engage in biomarker research: The UBIGR Study.

Gooding D, Mohrbacher D, Umucu E, Van Hulle C, Lewis J, Carter F Psychiatry Res. 2024; 334:115776.

PMID: 38377801 PMC: 11835010. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115776.


Anesthesiologists' Attitudes Toward Randomization to General versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Neuman M, Lim G, Dinh C, Clapp J Anesthesiology. 2023; 140(1):170-172.

PMID: 38085157 PMC: 10751982. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004791.


Precision Recruitment and Engagement of Individuals at Risk for Diabetes and Hypertension in Clinical Trials (PREDHICT): A Randomized Trial for an E-Persuasive Mobile Application to Inform Decision Making about Clinical Trials.

Seixas A, Richards S, Moore J, Izeogu C, Hollimon L, Jin P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(23).

PMID: 38063545 PMC: 10706176. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20237115.


References
1.
Briggs N, MacCallum R . Recovery of Weak Common Factors by Maximum Likelihood and Ordinary Least Squares Estimation. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 38(1):25-56. DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_2. View

2.
Karlawish J, Casarett D, Klocinski J, Sankar P . How do AD patients and their caregivers decide whether to enroll in a clinical trial?. Neurology. 2001; 56(6):789-92. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.6.789. View

3.
Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

4.
Karlawish J, Rubright J, Casarett D, Cary M, Ten Have T, Sankar P . Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 166(2):182-8. PMC: 2635420. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050645. View

5.
Kim S, Kim H, McCallum C, Tariot P . What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research?. Neurology. 2005; 65(9):1395-401. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183144.61428.73. View