» Articles » PMID: 21450284

Short-term Memory Stages in Sign Vs. Speech: the Source of the Serial Span Discrepancy

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Apr 1
PMID 21450284
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speakers generally outperform signers when asked to recall a list of unrelated verbal items. This phenomenon is well established, but its source has remained unclear. In this study, we evaluate the relative contribution of the three main processing stages of short-term memory--perception, encoding, and recall--in this effect. The present study factorially manipulates whether American Sign Language (ASL) or English is used for perception, memory encoding, and recall in hearing ASL-English bilinguals. Results indicate that using ASL during both perception and encoding contributes to the serial span discrepancy. Interestingly, performing recall in ASL slightly increased span, ruling out the view that signing is in general a poor choice for short-term memory. These results suggest that despite the general equivalence of sign and speech in other memory domains, speech-based representations are better suited for the specific task of perception and memory encoding of a series of unrelated verbal items in serial order through the phonological loop. This work suggests that interpretation of performance on serial recall tasks in English may not translate straightforwardly to serial tasks in sign language.

Citing Articles

Language aptitude in the visuospatial modality: L2 British Sign Language acquisition and cognitive skills in British Sign Language-English interpreting students.

Watkins F, Webb S, Stone C, Thompson R Front Psychol. 2022; 13:932370.

PMID: 36186342 PMC: 9516300. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932370.


Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks.

Gu S, Pichler D, Kozak L, Lillo-Martin D Front Psychol. 2022; 13:921047.

PMID: 36160535 PMC: 9496651. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921047.


Shadowing in the manual modality.

Brozdowski C, Emmorey K Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020; 208:103092.

PMID: 32531500 PMC: 7387226. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103092.


Working Memory for Linguistic and Non-linguistic Manual Gestures: Evidence, Theory, and Application.

Rudner M Front Psychol. 2018; 9:679.

PMID: 29867655 PMC: 5962724. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00679.


The relation between working memory and language comprehension in signers and speakers.

Emmorey K, Giezen M, Petrich J, Spurgeon E, Farnady L Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017; 177:69-77.

PMID: 28477456 PMC: 5495138. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.014.


References
1.
Hanson V . Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: implications of encoding strategy for order recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1982; 8(6):572-83. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.8.6.572. View

2.
Krakow R, Hanson V . Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print. Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(3):265-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197689. View

3.
Wilson M, Emmorey K . Comparing sign language and speech reveals a universal limit on short-term memory capacity. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(8):682-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01766.x. View

4.
Wilson M, Emmorey K . A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language. Mem Cognit. 1997; 25(3):313-20. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211287. View

5.
Dosher B, Ma J . Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998; 24(2):316-35. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.2.316. View