» Articles » PMID: 21448087

Ultrasound Method for Estimating the Cross-sectional Area of the Psoas Major Muscle

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Mar 31
PMID 21448087
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to develop an ultrasonographic method for estimating the cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle.

Methods: The muscle cross-sectional area (CSA(MRI)) and thickness (MT(MRI)) of the psoas major muscle at L4-L5 on the right and left sides of the body were measured using magnetic resonance imaging in 11 healthy sedentary men age 21 to 25 yr. Ultrasonographic images were obtained at the corresponding sites where CSA(MRI) and MT(MRI) measurements were performed. From the ultrasonographic images, the thickness of the psoas major muscle (MT(US)) was analyzed on both sides of the body.

Results: The interclass correlation coefficient of MT(US) measurements performed on two separated days was 0.951 for the right side and 0.971 for the left side. CSA(MRI) was significantly correlated to MT(MRI) (r = 0.934 for the right side and r = 0.910 for the left side). There was no significant difference between MT(MRI) (4.68 ± 0.39 cm for the right side and 4.73 ± 0.39 cm for the left side) and MT(US) (4.67 ± 0.40 cm for the right side and 4.72 ± 0.43 cm for the left side). The MT(US) was significantly correlated to MT(MRI) (r = 0.979 for the right side and r = 0.980 for the left side) and CSA(MRI) (r = 0.947 for the right side and r = 0.916 for the left side).

Conclusion: The current results indicate that the psoas major muscle thickness determined by the ultrasonographic method is useful for estimating the cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques.

Ito K, Maeshima E, Arai N, Saito K, Koshiba H, Maruyama J Transl Sports Med. 2024; 2024:7774612.

PMID: 39502872 PMC: 11537743. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7774612.


Agreement in rotator cuff muscles measurement between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Ueda Y, Tanaka H, Takeuchi Y, Tachibana T, Inui H, Nobuhara K Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2022; 28:13-20.

PMID: 35415074 PMC: 8983312. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2022.03.005.


Sonographic assessment of low muscle quantity identifies mortality risk during COVID-19: a prospective single-centre study.

Kremer W, Labenz C, Kuchen R, Sagoschen I, Bodenstein M, Schreiner O J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021; 13(1):169-179.

PMID: 34881516 PMC: 8818698. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12862.


Rectus Abdominis Muscle Thickness is a Valid Measure of Cross-Sectional Area: Implications for Ultrasound.

Kelly C, Mourtzakis M, Furberg H, Tandon P, Paris M Acad Radiol. 2021; 29(3):382-387.

PMID: 34253439 PMC: 9447478. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.06.005.


Intrarater reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of psoas major muscle in patients with subacute low back pain and healthy controls.

Yaghoubi Z, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Sarrafzadeh J, Rezasoltani A, Maroufi N Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021; 34:145.

PMID: 33437741 PMC: 7787047. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.34.145.