» Articles » PMID: 21442404

A First Insight into Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in the US Peanut Minicore Collection

Overview
Journal Genetica
Specialties Cell Biology
Genetics
Date 2011 Mar 29
PMID 21442404
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowledge of genetic diversity, population structure, and degree of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in target association mapping populations is of great importance and is a prerequisite for LD-based mapping. In the present study, 96 genotypes comprising 92 accessions of the US peanut minicore collection, a component line of the tetraploid variety Florunner, diploid progenitors A. duranensis (AA) and A. ipaënsis (BB), and synthetic amphidiploid accession TxAG-6 were investigated with 392 simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker bands amplified using 32 highly-polymorphic SSR primer pairs. Both distance- and model-based (Bayesian) cluster analysis revealed the presence of structured diversity. In general, the wild-species accessions and the synthetic amphidiploid grouped separately from most minicore accessions except for COC155, and were eliminated from most subsequent analyses. UPGMA analysis divided the population into four subgroups, two major subgroups representing subspecies fastigiata and hypogaea, a third group containing individuals from each subspecies or possibly of mixed ancestry, and a fourth group, either consisting of COC155 alone if wild species were excluded, or of COC155, the diploid species, and the synthetic amphidiploid. Model-based clustering identified four subgroups- one each for fastigiata and hypogaea subspecies, a third consisting of individuals of both subspecies or of mixed ancestry predominantly from Africa or Asia, and a fourth group, consisting of individuals predominantly of var fastigiata, peruviana, and aequatoriana accessions from South America, including COC155. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed statistically-significant (P < 0.0001) genetic variance of 16.87% among subgroups. A total of 4.85% of SSR marker pairs revealed significant LD (at r(2) ≥ 0.1). Of the syntenic marker pairs separated by distances < 10 cM, 11-20 cM, 21-50 cM, and > 50 cM, 19.33, 5.19, 6.25 and 5.29% of marker pairs were found in strong LD (P ≤ 0.01), in accord with LD extending to great distances in self pollinated crops. A threshold value of r(2) > 0.035 was found to distinguish mean r(2) values of linkage distance groups statistically from the mean r(2) values of unlinked markers; LD was found to extend to 10 cM over the entire minicore collection by this criterion. However, there were large differences in r(2) values among marker pairs even among tightly-linked markers. The implications of these findings with regard to the possibility of using association mapping for detection of genome-wide SSR marker-phenotype association are discussed.

Citing Articles

Reduced-Cost Genotyping by Resequencing in Peanut Breeding Programs Using Tecan Allegro Targeted Resequencing V2.

Sung C, Kulkarni R, Hillhouse A, Simpson C, Cason J, Burow M Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39596564 PMC: 11593647. DOI: 10.3390/genes15111364.


Chloroplast and whole-genome sequencing shed light on the evolutionary history and phenotypic diversification of peanuts.

Zheng Z, Sun Z, Qi F, Fang Y, Lin K, Pavan S Nat Genet. 2024; 56(9):1975-1984.

PMID: 39138385 PMC: 11387195. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01876-7.


Characterization of the Genetic Variability within Genotypes by Phenotypic Traits and SSR Markers with Special Reference to Geographic Distribution.

Uddin N, Muhammad N, Ali S, Ullah R, Bari A, Hussain H Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36672897 PMC: 9858891. DOI: 10.3390/genes14010155.


Assessment of genetic diversity and SNP marker development within peanut germplasm in Taiwan by RAD-seq.

Hsu Y, Wang S, Tseng Y, Lee S, Fang H, Hung W Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14495.

PMID: 36008445 PMC: 9411510. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18737-0.


Chloroplast Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal a Maternal Hybridization Event Leading to the Formation of Cultivated Peanuts.

Tian X, Shi L, Guo J, Fu L, Du P, Huang B Front Plant Sci. 2022; 12:804568.

PMID: 34975994 PMC: 8718879. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.804568.


References
1.
Mather K, Caicedo A, Polato N, Olsen K, McCouch S, Purugganan M . The extent of linkage disequilibrium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics. 2007; 177(4):2223-32. PMC: 2219496. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.079616. View

2.
Remington D, Thornsberry J, Matsuoka Y, Wilson L, Whitt S, Doebley J . Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(20):11479-84. PMC: 58755. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.201394398. View

3.
Abdurakhmonov I, Saha S, Jenkins J, Buriev Z, Shermatov S, Scheffler B . Linkage disequilibrium based association mapping of fiber quality traits in G. hirsutum L. variety germplasm. Genetica. 2008; 136(3):401-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9337-8. View

4.
Hamblin M, Mitchell S, White G, Gallego J, Kukatla R, Wing R . Comparative population genetics of the panicoid grasses: sequence polymorphism, linkage disequilibrium and selection in a diverse sample of sorghum bicolor. Genetics. 2004; 167(1):471-83. PMC: 1470838. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.471. View

5.
Varshney R, Bertioli D, Moretzsohn M, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Aruna R . The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 118(4):729-39. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0933-x. View