» Articles » PMID: 21439170

Involving Patients with Depression in Research: Survey of Patients' Attitudes to Participation

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Mar 29
PMID 21439170
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinicians report barriers to involving their patients in mental health research and have concerns that participation may have negative effects.

Aim: To investigate patients' views on participating in a primary care randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing two antidepressant drugs.

Design Of Study: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: General practices, England.

Method: Six hundred and one trial participants were surveyed about their reasons for, and experience of, participating.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 252/601 (42%) participants. The most influential factors determining participation were: wanting to help others with depression (94%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 90 to 97%) of responders rated this as 'important' or 'very important'); friendly researchers (94%, 95% CI = 90 to 96%); and interest in the research (88%, 95% CI = 83 to 91%). Most were glad they took part and would consider participating in future research. Ninety-six per cent (95% CI = 92 to 98%) reported that their confidence in their GP had increased or remained unchanged since referral. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses indicated that patients found participation beneficial and liked: being altruistic, doing something positive, feeling supported by the researchers, and having time to talk. Many gained understanding of their depression and valued feedback on their progress. A minority reported negative views, which commonly related to taking antidepressants, and answering questionnaires.

Conclusion: GPs have a vital role in facilitating patient involvement in research but report barriers to referring depressed patients to RCTs. However, this data suggests that patients are willing to participate and many find this beneficial. Understanding attitudes to participation in mental health research is a crucial step in designing trials that are more acceptable to patients and GPs. This will strengthen the evidence for therapeutic approaches in primary care.

Citing Articles

Walk-and-Talk Therapy Versus Conventional Indoor Therapy for Men With Low Mood: A Randomised Pilot Study.

Dickmeyer A, Smith J, Halpin S, McMullen S, Drew R, Morgan P Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025; 32(1):e70035.

PMID: 39907105 PMC: 11795730. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70035.


The association of baseline depressive symptoms and stress on withdrawal in a national longitudinal cohort: the REGARDS study.

Lin C, Howard V, Nanavati H, Judd S, Howard G Ann Epidemiol. 2023; 84:8-15.

PMID: 37182817 PMC: 10524111. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.007.


Acceptability of integrating smoking cessation treatment into routine care for people with mental illness: A qualitative study.

Sawyer K, Fredman Stein K, Jacobsen P, Freeman T, Blackwell A, Metcalfe C Health Expect. 2022; 26(1):108-118.

PMID: 36222067 PMC: 9854288. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13580.


Social Isolation-Mediated Exacerbation of Negative Affect in Young Drinkers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Neppala G, Terkuhle I, Wagner A, Lepow L, Shaik R, Freed R Brain Sci. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35203977 PMC: 8870361. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020214.


Participating in Longitudinal Observational Research on Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Quantitative Results From a Patient Perspective Study.

Dehn L, Driessen M, Steinhart I, Beblo T Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:834389.

PMID: 35185660 PMC: 8854761. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.834389.


References
1.
Beck A, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, ERBAUGH J . An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-71. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. View

2.
Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T . Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be.... BMJ. 2002; 325(7367):766-70. PMC: 1124277. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766. View

3.
Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H, Timmis A, Jones M . Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies. BMJ. 2005; 331(7522):940. PMC: 1261191. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE. View

4.
Mason V, Shaw A, Wiles N, Mulligan J, Peters T, Sharp D . GPs' experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment. Fam Pract. 2007; 24(5):518-25. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmm047. View

5.
Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N . Short report: how often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays?. Fam Pract. 2007; 24(6):601-3. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmm051. View