» Articles » PMID: 21437180

A Cytohistologic Correlation of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Emphasizing the Rare Oncocytic Variant

Overview
Publisher Hindawi
Specialty Pathology
Date 2011 Mar 26
PMID 21437180
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well-known that the morphological variability of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands may lead to interpretative difficulties on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis. In this study we identify morphologic features that may be useful in the FNA diagnosis of MEC. The cohort included 23 cases of MEC; cytology and histology slides were reviewed and assessed for % cystic component, extracellular mucin, mucous and intermediate cells, oncocytes, cells with foamy/clear cytoplasm, keratinized cells and lymphocytes. On FNA 12/23 (52%) cases were diagnosed as consistent with or suggestive of MEC; 6/23 (26%) as salivary gland neoplasm and 5/23 (22%) as no tumor seen. The cystic component was ≥50% in 18/23 (78%) and <50% in 5 cases. The features prevalent in FNA and histology were: mucous cells (96% and 91%), extracellular mucin (91% both), intermediate cells (100 and 83%), lymphocytes (96 and 78%) and cells with foamy/clear cytoplasm (74% both). Oncocytes were seen in 43 and 22% and keratinized cells in 48 and 13% cases. Cases with oncocytes and lymphocytes were interpreted as favor Warthin's tumor on FNA. Presence of mucous cells, cells with foamy/clear cytoplasm, intermediate cells and lymphocytes in a mucinous background are diagnostic indicators of MEC; presence of oncocytes should not refrain from diagnosing MEC in FNA specimens.

Citing Articles

Synchronous Parotid and Submandibular Warthin's Tumor: A Rare Presentation.

Ahuja S, Sureka N Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024; 15(Suppl 3):414-417.

PMID: 39328718 PMC: 11422333. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-024-01994-y.


Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) Cytology of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma and its Diagnostic Pitfalls: a Case Report.

Pandey D, Tummidi S, Saha R, Mondal S Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024; 15(1):108-112.

PMID: 38511019 PMC: 10948667. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01823-8.


Discordance between fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of parotid gland.

Iftikhar H, Awan M, Usman M, Khoja A, Khan W Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020; 102(5):340-342.

PMID: 32159383 PMC: 7374778. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0022.


Diagnostic Approach to Fine Needle Aspirations of Cystic Lesions of the Salivary Gland.

Pantanowitz L, Thompson L, Rossi E Head Neck Pathol. 2018; 12(4):548-561.

PMID: 29524082 PMC: 6232202. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-018-0904-8.


Applications of molecular testing in surgical pathology of the head and neck.

Hunt J Mod Pathol. 2017; 30(s1):S104-S111.

PMID: 28060367 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.192.

References
1.
Eversole L . Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: review of 815 reported cases. J Oral Surg. 1970; 28(7):490-4. View

2.
Deveci M, Deveci G, Gunhan O, Finci R . Oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: report of a case with DNA ploidy analysis and review of the literature. Pathol Int. 2000; 50(11):905-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2000.01129.x. View

3.
Corcione L, Giordano G, Gnetti L, Multinu A, Ferrari S . Oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of a submandibular gland: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(6):560-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.12.017. View

4.
Cajulis R, Gokaslan S, Yu G . Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the salivary glands. A five-year experience with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41(5):1412-20. DOI: 10.1159/000332852. View

5.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P . Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. VII. Cytology and histology correlation of five cases of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998; 19(6):405-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199812)19:6<405::aid-dc1>3.0.co;2-#. View