» Articles » PMID: 21431300

Value of the Correct Diagnostic Pathway Through Conventional Imaging (mammography and Ultrasound) in Evaluating Breast Disease

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Mar 25
PMID 21431300
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the role of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging in evaluating breast disease.

Materials And Methods: Six hundred patients aged between 35 and 75 years were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent detailed history and clinical examination, ultrasound (US) and mammography. US scans were repeated after mammography. All suspicious lesions were studied by cytological and histological characterisation and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Results: The first US scan showed 147 solid lesions, 67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure. The second US scan, performed after mammography, confirmed 123/147 solid nodular lesions, 53/67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 183/193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure; it also showed 13 nodular lesions not seen on the first scan and two cases of nodular lesions with irregular calcifications.

Conclusions: Our experience suggests that US not performed in conjunction with mammography gives rise to incorrect diagnostic interpretations (either false positive or false negative results). The detection rate of the US scan performed after mammography increases from 4.16% to 5.5%.

Citing Articles

Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinic.

Palazzetti V, Guidi F, Ottaviani L, Valeri G, Baldassarre S, Giuseppetti G Radiol Med. 2016; 121(11):828-833.

PMID: 27372707 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0655-0.


Inappropriateness of breast imaging: cost analysis.

Pistolese C, Ciarrapico A, della Gatta F, Simonetti G Radiol Med. 2013; 118(6):984-94.

PMID: 23801396 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0948-5.

References
1.
Chan S, Cheung P, Chan S, Lau S, Wong T, Ma M . Benefit of ultrasonography in the detection of clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer. World J Surg. 2007; 32(12):2593-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9273-2. View

2.
Baek S, Kim M, Kim E, Youk J, Lee H, Son E . Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 28(10):1349-56. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1349. View

3.
Zahl P, Maehlen J . [Breast cancer mortality versus breast cancer survival]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010; 130(3):261. DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0033. View

4.
Chen J, Huang C, Chang Chien K, Takada E, Moon W, Wu J . Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2009; 36(11):4933-43. DOI: 10.1118/1.3233682. View

5.
Kimmick G, Balducci L . Breast cancer and aging. Clinical interactions. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000; 14(1):213-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70285-9. View