» Articles » PMID: 21414927

Functional Rather Than Effector-specific Organization of Human Posterior Parietal Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Mar 19
PMID 21414927
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies have shown that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) distinguishes between the planning of eye and hand movements. This distinction has usually been interpreted as evidence for a modular, effector-specific organization of this cerebral region. However, the eyes differ markedly from other body parts both in terms of their functional purpose and with regard to the spatial transformations required to plan goal-directed movements. PPC may therefore provide specialized subregions for eye movements, but distinguish less for other effectors. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we compared activity during memory-guided eye, hand, and foot movements in human participants. The results did not reveal any significant activation differences during the planning of hand and foot movements, except in the most anterior part of PPC [Brodmann's area (BA) 5], marginally extending into anterior BA 7/40. This region showed a lateral-to-medial gradient for hand versus foot movement planning. The limb-unspecific PPC regions were functionally connected with hand and foot motor regions. In contrast, a gradient-like organization was found for all of PPC for the planning of eye versus hand and foot movements. Although planning-related activity across the three effectors considerably overlapped, saccade planning activated occipitoparietal regions more than limb movements, whereas limb movements activated anterior regions of the superior parietal lobule more than saccades. We infer that PPC does not follow a strict effector-specific organization. Rather, the large-scale organization of this region might reflect the different computational constraints that need to be satisfied when planning eye and limb movements.

Citing Articles

Exploring imitation of within hand prehensile object manipulation using fMRI and graph theory analysis.

Krammer W, Missimer J, Vallesi V, Pastore-Wapp M, Kagi G, Wiest R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3641.

PMID: 39881129 PMC: 11779809. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86157-x.


The benefit of making voluntary choices generalizes across multiple effectors.

Luo X, Wang L, Gu J, Zhang Q, Ma H, Zhou X Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(1):340-352.

PMID: 37620630 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02350-x.


Dynamic spatial coding in parietal cortex mediates tactile-motor transformation.

Klautke J, Foster C, Medendorp W, Heed T Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):4532.

PMID: 37500625 PMC: 10374589. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39959-4.


Allocation of Visuospatial Attention Indexes Evidence Accumulation for Reach Decisions.

Schonard C, Heed T, Seegelke C eNeuro. 2022; 9(6).

PMID: 36302633 PMC: 9651207. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0313-22.2022.


Egomotion-related visual areas respond to goal-directed movements.

Bellagamba M, Sulpizio V, Fattori P, Galati G, Galletti C, Maltempo T Brain Struct Funct. 2022; 227(7):2313-2328.

PMID: 35763171 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-022-02523-9.


References
1.
SNYDER L, Batista A, Andersen R . Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 1997; 386(6621):167-70. DOI: 10.1038/386167a0. View

2.
Orban G, Claeys K, Nelissen K, Smans R, Sunaert S, Todd J . Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 44(13):2647-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.001. View

3.
Calton J, Dickinson A, Snyder L . Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(6):580-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn0602-862. View

4.
Friston K, Buechel C, Fink G, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan R . Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 1997; 6(3):218-29. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0291. View

5.
Pellijeff A, Bonilha L, Morgan P, McKenzie K, Jackson S . Parietal updating of limb posture: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(13):2685-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.009. View