» Articles » PMID: 21414052

Cutting the Research Pie: a Value-weighting Approach to Explore Perceptions About Psychosocial Research Priorities for Adults with Haematological Cancers

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Nursing
Oncology
Date 2011 Mar 19
PMID 21414052
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the burden of illness associated with haematological cancers, little research is available about improving psychosocial outcomes for this group. Given scarce research funds, it is important to ensure that resources are used strategically for improving their psychosocial well-being. This study aimed to identify the perceptions of professionals, patients and carers regarding prioritising psychosocial research efforts. First, an expert panel's views on priorities for research were identified. This was followed by a web survey to obtain the perceptions of 117 health professionals, patients and carers. The value-weighting survey used points allocation, allowing respondents to indicate the relative priority of each option. A substantial proportion of resources were allocated to patients who were newly diagnosed or receiving treatment. Less priority was given to other stages of the cancer journey or non-patient populations. There was no indication that any type of psychosocial research was a priority; however, some differences were identified when comparing the priorities of the three respondent groups. To improve psychosocial outcomes for haematological cancer patients, resources should be directed towards patients in the early stages of the cancer journey. There may be a need for research investigating potential interventions to improve psychosocial outcomes for patients with haematological cancers.

Citing Articles

Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences.

Wolfenden L, Hall A, Bauman A, Milat A, Hodder R, Webb E Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):58.

PMID: 38745326 PMC: 11095011. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01144-4.


Disseminating health research to public health policy-makers and practitioners: a survey of source, message content and delivery modality preferences.

McCrabb S, Hall A, Milat A, Bauman A, Hodder R, Mooney K Health Res Policy Syst. 2023; 21(1):121.

PMID: 38012773 PMC: 10680334. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01066-7.


Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science.

Rankin N, McGregor D, Butow P, White K, Phillips J, Young J BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1):110.

PMID: 27566679 PMC: 5002198. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0210-7.


Patient involvement in research priorities (PIRE): a study protocol.

Piil K, Jarden M BMJ Open. 2016; 6(5):e010615.

PMID: 27221126 PMC: 4885285. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010615.


Consumer participation in quality improvements for chronic disease care: development and evaluation of an interactive patient-centered survey to identify preferred service initiatives.

Fradgley E, Paul C, Bryant J, Roos I, Henskens F, Paul D J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(12):e292.

PMID: 25532217 PMC: 4285719. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3545.


References
1.
McLachlan S, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M . Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(21):4117-25. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.21.4117. View

2.
Chalkidou K, Whicher D, Kary W, Tunis S . Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25(3):241-8. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990225. View

3.
Beretta R . A critical review of the Delphi technique. Nurse Res. 2016; 3(4):79-89. DOI: 10.7748/nr.3.4.79.s8. View

4.
MADDOCKS I, Bentley L, Sheedy J . Quality of life issues in patients dying from haematological diseases. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994; 23(2):244-8. View

5.
Scott D, Mills M, Black A, Cantwell M, Campbell A, Cardwell C . Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (3):CD007730. PMC: 6457813. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007730.pub2. View