Safety of Pull-type and Introducer Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes in Oncology Patients: a Retrospective Analysis

Overview

Journal BMC Gastroenterol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2011 Mar 18

PMID 21410958

Citations 16

Authors

Evi Van Dyck

Elisabeth J Macken

Bernard Roth

Paul A Pelckmans

Tom G Moreels

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) allows long-term tube feeding. Safety of pull-type and introducer PEG placement in oncology patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies is unknown.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 299 patients undergoing PEG tube placement between January 2006 and December 2008 revealed 57 oncology patients. All patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancy were treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. In case of high-grade stenosis introducer Freka® Pexact PEG tube was placed (n = 24) and in all other patients (n = 33) conventional pull-type PEG tube. Short-term complications and mortality rates were compared.

Results: Patients' characteristics and clinical status were comparable in both groups. Short-term complications were encountered in 11/24 (48%) introducer PEG patients as compared to only 4/33 (12%) pull-type PEG patients (P < 0.05). Accidental removal of the introducer PEG tube occurred in 4/24 (17%) with need for surgical intervention in 1 vs. 0/33 (0%, P < 0.05). Wound infection occurred in 3/24 (12%) leading to septic shock and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in 1 vs. 3/33 (9%, NS). Finally, 3/24 gastrointestinal perforations (12%) resulted from a difficult placement procedure vs. 1/33 (3%), leading to urgent surgical intervention and admission to ICU. Two introducer PEG patients died at ICU, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 8% vs. 0% (P = 0.091).

Conclusion: The introducer Freka® Pexact PEG procedure for long-term tube feeding may lead to significantly higher complication and mortality rates in patients with head/neck or oesophageal malignancies treated with chemo- and radiotherapy. It is suggested to use the conventional pull-type PEG tube placement in this group of patients, if possible.

Citing Articles

Hybrid percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (Hybrid PEG) improves patient safety by combining pull-through technique with gastropexy.

Kinzel T, Reich V, Schuhmacher L, Bojarski C, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a25112096.

PMID: 40018077 PMC: 11866035. DOI: 10.1055/a-2511-2096.

Percutaneous Gastrostomies: Associated Complications in PUSH vs. PULL Techniques over 12 Years in a Referral Centre.

Pinar-Gutierrez A, Gonzalez-Gracia L, Vazquez Gutierrez R, Garcia-Rey S, Jimenez-Sanchez A, Gonzalez-Navarro I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610601 PMC: 11012573. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071836.

Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.

Tae C, Lee J, Joo M, Park C, Gong E, Shin C Gut Liver. 2023; 18(1):10-26.

PMID: 37850251 PMC: 10791499. DOI: 10.5009/gnl230146.

Clinical practice guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Tae C, Lee J, Joo M, Park C, Gong E, Shin C Clin Endosc. 2023; 56(4):391-408.

PMID: 37430395 PMC: 10393568. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.062.

Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Chen Y, Hou M, Yang T, Lee P, Wang Y, Huang Y BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):155.

PMID: 37189057 PMC: 10186665. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02702-w.

References

Cosentini E, Sautner T, Gnant M, Winkelbauer F, Teleky B, Jakesz R . Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies. Arch Surg. 1998; 133(10):1076-83. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1076. View

Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E . Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5(6):649-55. View

Grant D, Bradley P, Pothier D, Bailey D, Caldera S, Baldwin D . Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009; 34(2):103-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01889.x. View

Dormann A, Wejda B, Kahl S, Huchzermeyer H, Ebert M, Malfertheiner P . Long-term results with a new introducer method with gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(6):1229-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00541.x. View

Baltz J, Argo C, Al-Osaimi A, Northup P . Mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with cirrhosis: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(5):1072-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.043. View

Shastri Y, Hoepffner N, Tessmer A, Ackermann H, Schroeder O, Stein J . New introducer PEG gastropexy does not require prophylactic antibiotics: multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67(4):620-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.044. View

Gauderer M . Twenty years of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: origin and evolution of a concept and its expanded applications. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(6):879-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70186-0. View

Nicholson F, Korman M, Richardson M . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000; 15(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02004.x. View

Schulenberg E, Schule S, Lehnert T . Emergency surgery for complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Endoscopy. 2010; 42(10):872-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255761. View

10.

Wejda B, Deppe H, Huchzermeyer H, Dormann A . PEG placement in patients with ascites: a new approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61(1):178-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02449-6. View

11.

Yuki M, Amano Y, Komazawa Y, Fukuhara H, Shizuku T, Yamamoto S . Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(44):5586-91. PMC: 2785063. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.5586. View

12.

Campoli P, Cardoso D, Turchi M, Ejima F, Mota O . Assessment of safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an experience with 435 cases. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009; 9:48. PMC: 2717113. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-48. View

13.

Dormann A, Glosemeyer R, Leistner U, Deppe H, Roggel R, Wigginghaus B . Modified percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with gastropexy--early experience with a new introducer technique. Z Gastroenterol. 2001; 38(12):933-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-10025. View

14.

Gay F, El Nawar A, Van Gossum A . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1992; 55(3):285-94. View

15.

Adelson R, Ducic Y . Metastatic head and neck carcinoma to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. Head Neck. 2005; 27(4):339-43. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20159. View

16.

Kadota T, Nakagawa K, Taguchi J, Ono H, Hiraide H, TAMAKUMA S . A simplified percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy using the trocar introducer technique with peel-away sheath. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991; 173(6):490-4. View

17.

Mekhail T, Adelstein D, Rybicki L, Larto M, Saxton J, Lavertu P . Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube?. Cancer. 2001; 91(9):1785-90. View

18.

Larson D, Burton D, Schroeder K, DiMagno E . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987; 93(1):48-52. View

19.

Galaski A, Peng W, Ellis M, Darling P, Common A, Tucker E . Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications and outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009; 23(2):109-14. PMC: 2694590. DOI: 10.1155/2009/801925. View

20.

Kwon R, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl D, Farraye F, Kaul V . Enteral nutrition access devices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(2):236-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.008. View