» Articles » PMID: 21409546

Revised Ultrasound Criteria for Appendicitis in Children Improve Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2011 Mar 17
PMID 21409546
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Use of CT in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children is common. Expanding the use of US would eliminate the radiation exposure associated with CT.

Objective: We describe new criteria that improve US's diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis, making it more comparable to CT in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 304 consecutive patients undergoing US for the diagnosis of appendicitis in our institution during 2006. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the maximal outer diameter (MOD) at various measurements was calculated and compared to pathology results. Additional variables (appendiceal wall thickness, fecalith, hyperemia, fat stranding, free fluid, age and weight) were also evaluated.

Results: The highest sensitivity (98.7%) and specificity (95.4%) were identified when MOD was ≥7 mm or wall thickness was >1.7 mm. These values resulted in correctly classifying 96.6% of cases, with 1 (0.5%) false-negative and 6 (2.9%) false-positive studies. Incorporating secondary signs of appendicitis, age or weight did not alter accuracy.

Conclusion: These findings identify new US criteria that compare favorably to CT. In children with suspected appendicitis, using US as the initial imaging study will ultimately lead to improved accuracy, lower cost and the elimination of ionizing radiation exposure.

Citing Articles

Correlation of histological diagnosis and laboratory findings in distinguishing acute appendicitis and lymphoid hyperplasia.

Ucar Karabulut K, Erinanc H, Yonar A, Kisinma A, Ucar Y Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022; 103(5):306-311.

PMID: 36452309 PMC: 9678668. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.5.306.


[Imaging Findings of Gastrointestinal Emergency in Infants and Young Children].

Kim J Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022; 81(4):794-805.

PMID: 36238180 PMC: 9432212. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.4.794.


The role of hematological parameters in distinguishing acute appendicitis from lymphoid hyperplasia.

Kaya A, Karaman K, Aziret M, Ercan M, Kose E, Kahraman Y Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022; 28(4):434-439.

PMID: 35485518 PMC: 10443127. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.69027.


Falling through the worm hole: an exploration of the imaging workup of the vermiform appendix in the pediatric population.

Sams C, Ayyala R, Swenson D BJR Open. 2020; 1(1):20190016.

PMID: 33178945 PMC: 7592479. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20190016.


Diagnostic performance of standardized ultrasound protocol for detecting perforation in pediatric appendicitis.

Riedesel E, Weber B, Shore M, Cartmill R, Ostlie D, Leys C Pediatr Radiol. 2019; 49(13):1726-1734.

PMID: 31342129 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04475-5.


References
1.
Pena B, Taylor G, Lund D, Mandl K . Effect of computed tomography on patient management and costs in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3 Pt 1):440-6. DOI: 10.1542/peds.104.3.440. View

2.
Sivit C, Applegate K . Imaging of acute appendicitis in children. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2003; 24(2):74-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(03)90003-5. View

3.
Balthazar E, Megibow A, Siegel S, Birnbaum B . Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology. 1991; 180(1):21-4. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.180.1.2052696. View

4.
Rao P, Rhea J, Novelline R, Mostafavi A, McCabe C . Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338(3):141-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380301. View

5.
Doria A . Optimizing the role of imaging in appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39 Suppl 2:S144-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-1105-5. View