» Articles » PMID: 21409489

Aberrant Gene Methylation is a Biomarker for the Detection of Cancer Cells in Peritoneal Wash Samples from Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Mar 17
PMID 21409489
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether gene methylation in peritoneal fluid (PF) is clinically feasible for determining micrometastasis to the peritoneum in gastric cancer.

Methods: The gene methylation of BNIP3, CHFR, CYP1B1, MINT25, SFRP2, and RASSF2 were analyzed in 107 specimens of PF by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. All patients were placed into one of 3 groups: group A (n = 42), patients with depth of cancer invasion at muscularis propria (MP) or less than MP; group B (n = 45), depth of cancer invasion beyond the MP; and group C (n = 20), histologically diagnosed peritoneal metastasis or cancer cells cytologically defined in the peritoneal cavity. Patients in both groups A and B were diagnosed as having no cancer cells by peritoneal cytology and histology.

Results: The methylation status of the 6 genes was found to be significantly different among the 3 groups (group A, 0-5%; group B, 0-15%; group C, 15-45%; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the rate of positive methylation in any of the 6 genes was significantly different in each group (group A, 7%; group B, 20%; group C, 75%; P < 0.001). Three of 9 patients in group B with positive methylation in any of 6 genes experienced peritoneal recurrence. On the other hand, only 1 of 36 patients without gene methylation experienced peritoneal recurrence (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: DNA methylation in PFs is a possible marker detecting occult neoplastic cells on the peritoneum. Methylation analysis along with a cytological examination might therefore improve the positive detection of cancer cells in PF of gastric cancer.

Citing Articles

Sialic acid metabolism-based classification reveals novel metabolic subtypes with distinct characteristics of tumor microenvironment and clinical outcomes in gastric cancer.

Jiang J, Chen Y, Zheng Y, Ding Y, Wang H, Zhou Q Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):61.

PMID: 39987095 PMC: 11847363. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03695-0.


Transcriptomics-based liquid biopsy panel for early non-invasive identification of peritoneal recurrence and micrometastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Ding P, Wu H, Wu J, Li T, Gu R, Zhang L J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):181.

PMID: 38937855 PMC: 11212226. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03098-5.


Liquid Biopsy: An Emerging Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer.

Han H, Lee K J Gastric Cancer. 2024; 24(1):4-28.

PMID: 38225764 PMC: 10774753. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e5.


The prognostic impact of peritoneal tumour DNA in gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies: a systematic review.

Allan Z, Witts S, Tie J, Tebbutt N, Clemons N, Liu D Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(11):1717-1726.

PMID: 37700064 PMC: 10667497. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02424-6.


Prospective study to validate the clinical utility of DNA diagnosis of peritoneal fluid cytology test in gastric cancer.

Harada H, Soeno T, Nishizawa N, Washio M, Sakuraya M, Ushiku H Cancer Sci. 2021; 112(4):1644-1654.

PMID: 33576114 PMC: 8019217. DOI: 10.1111/cas.14850.