» Articles » PMID: 21403571

Influence of Implant Angulation with Different Crowns on Stress Distribution

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on straight and angulated implants with different crowns (screwed and cemented). Three models were made of photoelastic resin PL-2: model 1: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 0 degrees; model 2: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 17 degrees; model 3: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 30 degrees. Axial and oblique (45 degrees) load (100 N) was applied with a universal testing machine. The photoelastic fringes on the models were recorded with a digital camera and visualized in a graphic software for qualitative analysis. The axial loading generated the same pattern of stress distribution. The highest stresses were concentrated between medium and apical thirds. The oblique loading generated a similar pattern of stress distribution in the models with similar implant angulation; the highest stress was located on the cervical region opposite to implant angulation and on the apical third. It was concluded that the higher the implant angulation, the higher the stress value, independent of crown type. The screwed prostheses exhibited the highest stress concentration. The oblique load generated higher stress value and concentration than the axial load.

Citing Articles

Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Novel Screwless Retained Dental Implant Prosthesis: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Lee K, Kim J, Lim J, Ryu J J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 39997573 PMC: 11856067. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020039.


Impact Testing in Implant-Supported Prostheses and Natural Teeth: A Systematic Review of Properties and Performance.

Marti-Vigil J, Casamitjana J, Marimon X, Cerrolaza M, Medina-Galvez R, Canto-Naves O Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203218 PMC: 11356274. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164040.


Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.

Tezerisener H, Ozalp O, Altay M, Sindel A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):176.

PMID: 38310260 PMC: 10837953. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03761-x.


Implant angulation and fracture resistance of one-piece screw-retained hybrid monolithic zirconia ceramic restorations.

Bonyatpour M, Giti R, Erfanian B PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280816.

PMID: 36689439 PMC: 9870147. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280816.


Evaluation of immediately loaded mandibular four vertical versus tilted posterior implants supporting fixed detachable restorations without versus with posterior cantilevers.

Mohamed L, Khamis M, El-Sharkawy A, Fahmy R Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 26(3):373-381.

PMID: 34455503 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-00993-5.