Influence of Implant Angulation with Different Crowns on Stress Distribution
Overview
General Surgery
Authors
Affiliations
The aim of this study was to perform a photoelastic analysis of stress distribution on straight and angulated implants with different crowns (screwed and cemented). Three models were made of photoelastic resin PL-2: model 1: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 0 degrees; model 2: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 17 degrees; model 3: external hexagon implant 3.75×10.00 mm at 30 degrees. Axial and oblique (45 degrees) load (100 N) was applied with a universal testing machine. The photoelastic fringes on the models were recorded with a digital camera and visualized in a graphic software for qualitative analysis. The axial loading generated the same pattern of stress distribution. The highest stresses were concentrated between medium and apical thirds. The oblique loading generated a similar pattern of stress distribution in the models with similar implant angulation; the highest stress was located on the cervical region opposite to implant angulation and on the apical third. It was concluded that the higher the implant angulation, the higher the stress value, independent of crown type. The screwed prostheses exhibited the highest stress concentration. The oblique load generated higher stress value and concentration than the axial load.
Lee K, Kim J, Lim J, Ryu J J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(2).
PMID: 39997573 PMC: 11856067. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16020039.
Marti-Vigil J, Casamitjana J, Marimon X, Cerrolaza M, Medina-Galvez R, Canto-Naves O Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).
PMID: 39203218 PMC: 11356274. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164040.
Tezerisener H, Ozalp O, Altay M, Sindel A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):176.
PMID: 38310260 PMC: 10837953. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03761-x.
Bonyatpour M, Giti R, Erfanian B PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280816.
PMID: 36689439 PMC: 9870147. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280816.
Mohamed L, Khamis M, El-Sharkawy A, Fahmy R Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 26(3):373-381.
PMID: 34455503 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-00993-5.