» Articles » PMID: 21402866

Comparative Chloroplast Genomes of Pinaceae: Insights into the Mechanism of Diversified Genomic Organizations

Overview
Date 2011 Mar 16
PMID 21402866
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pinaceae, the largest family of conifers, has diversified organizations of chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) with the two typical inverted repeats (IRs) highly reduced. To unravel the mechanism of this genomic diversification, we examined the cpDNA organizations from 53 species of the ten Pinaceous genera, including those of Larix decidua (122,474 bp), Picea morrisonicola (124,168 bp), and Pseudotsuga wilsoniana (122,513 bp), which were firstly elucidated. The results uncovered four distinct cpDNA forms (A-C and P) that are due to rearrangements of two ∼20 and ∼21 kb specific fragments. The C form was documented for the first time and the A form might be the most ancestral one. In addition, only the individuals of Ps. macrocarpa and Ps. wilsoniana were detected to have isomeric cpDNA forms. Three types (types 1-3) of Pinaceae-specific repeats situated nearby the rearranged fragments were found to be syntenic. We hypothesize that type 1 (949 ± 343 bp) and type 3 (608 ± 73 bp) repeats are substrates for homologous recombination (HR), whereas type 2 repeats are likely inactive for HR because of their relatively short sizes (151 ± 30 bp). Conversions among the four distinct forms may be achieved by HR and mediated by type 1 or 3 repeats, thus resulting in increased diversity of cpDNA organizations. We propose that in the Pinaceae cpDNAs, the reduced IRs have lost HR activity, then decreasing the diversity of cpDNA organizations, but the specific repeats that the evolution endowed Pinaceae complement the reduced IRs and increase the diversity of cpDNA organizations.

Citing Articles

Complete organelle genomes of Korean fir, Abies koreana and phylogenomics of the gymnosperm genus Abies using nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA sequence data.

Park S, Kwak M, Park S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7636.

PMID: 38561351 PMC: 10985005. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58253-x.


Leaf variegation caused by plastome structural variation: an example from .

Zhou S, Ma K, Mower J, Liu Y, Zhou R Hortic Res. 2024; 11(3):uhae009.

PMID: 38464478 PMC: 10923649. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae009.


Phylogenomics and plastomics offer new evolutionary perspectives on Kalanchoideae (Crassulaceae).

Han S, Zhang S, Yi R, Bi D, Ding H, Yang J Ann Bot. 2024; 133(4):585-604.

PMID: 38359907 PMC: 11037489. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcae017.


Distinctive plastome evolution in carnivorous angiosperms.

Fu C, Wicke S, Zhu A, Li D, Gao L BMC Plant Biol. 2023; 23(1):660.

PMID: 38124058 PMC: 10731798. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04682-1.


Comparative Plastid Genome and Phylogenomic Analyses of Species.

Choi K, Hwang Y, Hong J, Kang J Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37895263 PMC: 10606940. DOI: 10.3390/genes14101914.


References
1.
Kolodner R, Tewari K . Inverted repeats in chloroplast DNA from higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979; 76(1):41-5. PMC: 382872. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.41. View

2.
Hirao T, Watanabe A, Kurita M, Kondo T, Takata K . Complete nucleotide sequence of the Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. chloroplast genome and comparative chloroplast genomics: diversified genomic structure of coniferous species. BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8:70. PMC: 2443145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-70. View

3.
Strauss S, Palmer J, Howe G, Doerksen A . Chloroplast genomes of two conifers lack a large inverted repeat and are extensively rearranged. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(11):3898-902. PMC: 280327. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.11.3898. View

4.
Pombert J, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M . The chloroplast genome sequence of the green alga Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae) reveals unusual structural features and new insights into the branching order of chlorophyte lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 22(9):1903-18. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi182. View

5.
Stewart Jr C, Via L . A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques. 1993; 14(5):748-50. View