» Articles » PMID: 21400197

Formal and Informal Care for Disabled Elderly Living in the Community: an Appraisal of French Care Composition and Costs

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Mar 15
PMID 21400197
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Choices between formal and informal care for disabled elderly people living at home are a key component of the long-term care provision issues faced by an ageing population. This paper aims to identify factors associated with the type of care (informal, formal, mixed or no care at all) received by the French disabled elderly and to assess the care's relative costs.

Methods: This paper uses data from a French survey on disability; the 3,500 respondents of interest lived at home, were aged 60 and over, had severe disability and needed help with activities of daily living. We use a multinomial probit model to determine factors associated with type of care. We also assess the cost of care with the help of the proxy good method.

Results: One-third of disabled elderly people receive no care. Among those who are helped, 55% receive informal, 25% formal, and 20% mixed care. Low socioeconomic status increases difficulties in accessing formal care. The estimated economic value of informal care is 6.6 billion euro [95% CI = 5.9-7.2] and represents about two-thirds of the total cost of care.

Conclusion: Public policies should pay more attention to inequalities in access to community care. They also should better support informal care, through respite care or workplace accommodations (working hours rescheduling or reduction for instance) not detrimental for the career of working caregivers.

Citing Articles

Can Informal Care Be a Substitute for Formal Care? Evidence from Older People with Disabilities in Beijing, China.

Cai J, Jiang N, Coyte P Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765935 PMC: 11728084. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242508.


Time value of informal care of people with alzheimer's disease in Spain: a population-based analysis.

C V, J O Eur J Health Econ. 2024; .

PMID: 39117786 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01713-y.


[Support for family caregivers of older people during the COVID-19 pandemic].

Romero D, Groisman D, Maia L Cad Saude Publica. 2023; 39(11):e00072423.

PMID: 38126418 PMC: 10727031. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT072423.


Typologies of dependency, household characteristics, and disparity in formal and informal care use: analysis of community-dwelling long-term care insurance claimants in an urban municipality of China.

Fang S, Liang H, Liang Y Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):235.

PMID: 37950244 PMC: 10636834. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-02048-5.


Developing Family-Community Interactive program for the disabled older adults at home: a study protocol.

Wang P, Niu M, Chen Y, Wang S, Wu C, Zhao D BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):609.

PMID: 37773100 PMC: 10540501. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04273-7.


References
1.
Arno P, Levine C, Memmott M . The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999; 18(2):182-8. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.2.182. View

2.
Van Houtven C, Norton E . Informal care and health care use of older adults. J Health Econ. 2004; 23(6):1159-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008. View

3.
OShea E, Blackwell J . The relationship between the cost of community care and the dependency of old people. Soc Sci Med. 1993; 37(5):583-90. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90097-n. View

4.
Karlsson M, Mayhew L, Plumb R, Rickayzen B . Future costs for long-term care: cost projections for long-term care for older people in the United Kingdom. Health Policy. 2005; 75(2):187-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.03.006. View

5.
Gaymu J, Ekamper P, Beets G . Future trends in health and marital status: effects on the structure of living arrangements of older Europeans in 2030. Eur J Ageing. 2017; 5(1):5. PMC: 5546381. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-008-0072-x. View