» Articles » PMID: 21399941

Sociocultural and Psychological Determinants in Migrants for Noncompliance with Occlusion Therapy for Amblyopia

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2011 Mar 15
PMID 21399941
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia in children is low when their parents have a low level of education, speak Dutch poorly, or originate from another country. We determined how sociocultural and psychological determinants affect compliance.

Methods: Included were amblyopic children between the ages of 3 and 6, living in low socio-economic status (SES) areas. Compliance with occlusion therapy was measured electronically. Their parents completed an oral questionnaire, based on the "Social Position & Use of Social Services by Migrants and Natives" questionnaire that included demographics and questions on issues like education, employment, religion and social contacts. Parental fluency in Dutch was rated on a five-point scale. Regression analysis was used to describe the relationship between the level of compliance and sociocultural and psychological determinants.

Results: Data from 45 children and their parents were analyzed. Mean electronically measured compliance was 56 ± 44 percent. Children whose parents had close contact with their neighbors or who were highly dependent on their family demonstrated low levels of compliance. Children of parents who were members of a club and who had positive conceptualizations of Dutch society showed high levels of compliance. Poor compliance was also associated with low income, depression, and when patching interfered with the child's outdoor activity. Religion was not associated with compliance.

Conclusions: Poor compliance with occlusion therapy seems correlated with indicators of social cohesion. High social cohesion at micro level, i.e., family, neighbors and friends, and low social cohesion on macro level, i.e., Dutch society, are associated with noncompliance. However, such parents tend to speak Dutch poorly, so it is difficult to determine its actual cause.

Citing Articles

The Psychological Impact of Amblyopia Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review.

Haine L, Taylor I, Vaughan M Br Ir Orthopt J. 2025; 21(1):1-14.

PMID: 39831149 PMC: 11740718. DOI: 10.22599/bioj.426.


Randomised trial of three treatments for amblyopia: Vision therapy and patching, perceptual learning and patching alone.

Hernandez-Andres R, Serrano M, Alacreu-Crespo A, Luque M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(1):31-42.

PMID: 39396111 PMC: 11629843. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13395.


Phenomenological approach to childhood cataract treatment in New Zealand using semi-structured interviews: how might we improve provision of care.

Hamm L, Boluk K, Black J, Dai S, Thompson B BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e024869.

PMID: 30782745 PMC: 6352803. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024869.


The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Papageorgiou E, Asproudis I, Maconachie G, Tsironi E, Gottlob I Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 257(6):1061-1078.

PMID: 30706134 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04254-w.


Refractive adaptation and efficacy of occlusion therapy in untreated amblyopic patients aged 12 to 40 years.

Simonsz-Toth B, Joosse M, Besch D Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 257(2):379-389.

PMID: 30397791 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4170-y.


References
1.
Norredam M, Nielsen S, Krasnik A . Migrants' utilization of somatic healthcare services in Europe--a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2009; 20(5):555-63. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp195. View

2.
Smith L, Thompson J, Woodruff G, Hiscox F . Factors affecting treatment compliance in amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995; 32(2):98-101. DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950301-09. View

3.
Loudon S, Fronius M, Looman C, Awan M, Simonsz B, van der Maas P . Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(10):4393-400. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1428. View

4.
Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D . Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002; 360(9333):597-602. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09782-9. View

5.
Fielder A, Irwin M, Auld R, Cocker K, Jones H, Moseley M . Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995; 79(6):585-9. PMC: 505171. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.79.6.585. View