» Articles » PMID: 21389201

Hydrodynamic Stability of the Painted Turtle (Chrysemys Picta): Effects of Four-limbed Rowing Versus Forelimb Flapping in Rigid-bodied Tetrapods

Overview
Journal J Exp Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Mar 11
PMID 21389201
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hydrodynamic stability is the ability to resist recoil motions of the body produced by destabilizing forces. Previous studies have suggested that recoil motions can decrease locomotor performance, efficiency and sensory perception and that swimming animals might utilize kinematic strategies or possess morphological adaptations that reduce recoil motions and produce more stable trajectories. We used high-speed video to assess hydrodynamic stability during rectilinear swimming in the freshwater painted turtle (Chrysemys picta). Parameters of vertical stability (heave and pitch) were non-cyclic and variable, whereas measures of lateral stability (sideslip and yaw) showed repeatable cyclic patterns. In addition, because freshwater and marine turtles use different swimming styles, we tested the effects of propulsive mode on hydrodynamic stability during rectilinear swimming, by comparing our data from painted turtles with previously collected data from two species of marine turtle (Caretta caretta and Chelonia mydas). Painted turtles had higher levels of stability than both species of marine turtle for six of the eight parameters tested, highlighting potential disadvantages associated with 'aquatic flight'. Finally, available data on hydrodynamic stability of other rigid-bodied vertebrates indicate that turtles are less stable than boxfish and pufferfish.

Citing Articles

Determination of muscle strength and function in plesiosaur limbs: finite element structural analyses of humerus and femur.

Krahl A, Lipphaus A, Sander P, Witzel U PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13342.

PMID: 35677394 PMC: 9169670. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13342.


Body and Tail Coordination in the Bluespot Salamander () During Limb Regeneration.

Donatelli C, Lutek K, Gupta K, Standen E Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:629713.

PMID: 34124171 PMC: 8193843. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.629713.


"On the Fence" versus "All in": Insights from Turtles for the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotor Specializations and Habitat Transitions in Tetrapod Vertebrates.

Blob R, Mayerl C, Rivera A, Rivera G, Young V Integr Comp Biol. 2016; 56(6):1310-1322.

PMID: 27940619 PMC: 5146712. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icw121.


Don't rock the boat: how antiphase crew coordination affects rowing.

de Brouwer A, de Poel H, Hofmijster M PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54996.

PMID: 23383024 PMC: 3559869. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054996.


Forelimb kinematics during swimming in the pig-nosed turtle, Carettochelys insculpta, compared with other turtle taxa: rowing versus flapping, convergence versus intermediacy.

Rivera A, Rivera G, Blob R J Exp Biol. 2012; 216(Pt 4):668-80.

PMID: 23125335 PMC: 3561774. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.079715.

References
1.
Bartol I, Gharib M, Weihs D, Webb P, Hove J, Gordon M . Hydrodynamic stability of swimming in ostraciid fishes: role of the carapace in the smooth trunkfish Lactophrys triqueter (Teleostei: Ostraciidae). J Exp Biol. 2003; 206(Pt 4):725-44. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00137. View

2.
Hedrick T . Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim. 2008; 3(3):034001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/3/3/034001. View

3.
Rivera G, Rivera A, Dougherty E, Blob R . Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 21):4203-13. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02488. View

4.
Gillis G, Blob R . How muscles accommodate movement in different physical environments: aquatic vs. terrestrial locomotion in vertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001; 131(1):61-75. DOI: 10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00466-4. View

5.
Hove J, OBryan L, Gordon M, Webb P, Weihs D . Boxfishes (Teleostei: Ostraciidae) as a model system for fishes swimming with many fins: kinematics. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 8):1459-71. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.8.1459. View