» Articles » PMID: 21376271

Are Neighborhood Sociocultural Factors Influencing the Spatial Pattern of Gonorrhea in North Carolina?

Overview
Journal Ann Epidemiol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Mar 8
PMID 21376271
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Neighborhood-level sociocultural factors, primarily those indicative of neighborhood deprivation, explained a significant proportion of the spatial pattern of gonorrhea in both urban and rural communities. Race/ethnicity was an important proxy for social and cultural factors not captured by measures of socioeconomic status.

Methods: A generalized linear mixed model with spatially correlated random effects was fit to measure the influence of socio-cultural factors on the spatial pattern of gonorrhea reported to the North Carolina State Health Department (January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2008).

Results: Neighborhood gonorrhea rates increased as the percent single mothers increased (25th to 75th neighborhood percentile Relative Rate 1.18, 95% CI 1.12, 1.25), and decreased as socioeconomic status increased (Relative Rate 0.89, 95% CI 0.84, 0.95). Increasing numbers of men in neighborhoods with more women than men did not change the gonorrhea rate, but was associated with decreased rates in neighborhoods with more men than women. Living in the mountains was protective for all race/ethnicities. Rurality was associated with decreased rates for Blacks and increased rates for Native Americans outside the mountains.

Citing Articles

Relationship Between Sexually Transmitted Infections and Social Determinants of Health in Durham County, North Carolina, United States.

Jenks J, Nipp E, Tadikonda A, Karumuri N, Morales-Lagunes K, Carrico S Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023; 10(7):ofad368.

PMID: 37520426 PMC: 10372853. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad368.


Area-based comparison of risk factors and testing rates to improve sexual health care access: cross-sectional population-based study in a Dutch multicultural area.

Twisk D, Meima A, Richardus J, Gotz H BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e069000.

PMID: 37142318 PMC: 10163550. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069000.


Creating a path forward: understanding the context of sexual health and sexually transmitted infections in American Indian/Alaska Native populations – a review.

Leston J, Wenger H, Reilley B, Rushing S, Rink E, Warren H Sex Health. 2022; 19(4):286-298.

PMID: 35760766 PMC: 11081199. DOI: 10.1071/SH22040.


Association between Chlamydia and routine place for healthcare in the United States: NHANES 1999-2016.

Jamison C, Greenwood-Ericksen M, Richardson C, Choi H, Chang T PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251113.

PMID: 33970945 PMC: 8109783. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251113.


Exploring spatially varying demographic associations with gonorrhea incidence in Baltimore, Maryland, 2002-2005.

Switchenko J, Jennings J, Waller L J Geogr Syst. 2021; 22(2):201-216.

PMID: 33692652 PMC: 7943037. DOI: 10.1007/s10109-020-00321-7.


References
1.
Theall K, Scribner R, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Cohen D, Mason K, Simonsen N . Neighbourhood alcohol availability and gonorrhea rates: impact of social capital. Geospat Health. 2009; 3(2):241-55. PMC: 6167931. DOI: 10.4081/gh.2009.224. View

2.
Hampton K, Fitch M, Allshouse W, Doherty I, Gesink D, Leone P . Mapping health data: improved privacy protection with donut method geomasking. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172(9):1062-9. PMC: 2984253. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq248. View

3.
Li Q, Kirby R, Sigler R, Hwang S, LaGory M, Goldenberg R . A multilevel analysis of individual, household, and neighborhood correlates of intimate partner violence among low-income pregnant women in Jefferson county, Alabama. Am J Public Health. 2009; 100(3):531-9. PMC: 2820063. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151159. View

4.
Alvarez-Dardet C, Marquez S, Perea E . Urban clusters of sexually transmitted diseases in the city of Seville, Spain. Sex Transm Dis. 1985; 12(3):166-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-198507000-00016. View

5.
Bautista C, Sateren W, Sanchez J, Singer D, Scott P . Geographic mapping of HIV infection among civilian applicants for United States military service. Health Place. 2007; 14(3):608-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.004. View