» Articles » PMID: 21373868

Validity of Perceived Skin Wettedness Mapping to Evaluate Heat Strain

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2011 Mar 5
PMID 21373868
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of a newly developed method for quantifying perceived skin wettedness (W (p)) as an index to evaluate heat strain. Eight male subjects underwent 12 experimental conditions: activities (rest and exercise) × clothing (Control, Tyvek and Vinyl condition) × air temperatures (25 and 32°C). To quantify the W (p), a full body map with 21 demarcated regions was presented to the subject. The results showed that (1) at rest in 25°C, W (p) finally reached 4.4, 8.3 and 51.6% of the whole body surface area for Control, Tyvek, and Vinyl conditions, respectively, while W (p) at rest in 32°C rose to 35.8, 61.4 and 89.8%; (2) W (p) has a distinguishable power to detect the most wetted and the first wetted regions. The most wetted body regions were the upper back, followed by the chest, front neck, and forehead. The first perceived regions in the skin wetted map were the chest, forehead, and upper back; (3) W (p) at rest showed a significant relationship with the calculated skin wettedness (w) (r = 0.645, p < 0.01) and (4) W (p) had a significant relationship with core temperature, skin temperature, heart rate, total sweat rate, thermal comfort, and humidity sensation (p < 0.05), but these relationships were dependent on the level of activities and clothing insulation. W (p) in hot environments was more valid as a heat strain index of workers wearing normal clothing in light works, rather than wearing impermeable protective clothing in strenuous works.

Citing Articles

Hot water immersion is associated with higher thermal comfort than dry passive heating for a similar rise in rectal temperature and plasma interleukin-6 concentration.

Su Y, Hoekstra S, Leicht C Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(4):1109-1119.

PMID: 37870668 PMC: 10954860. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05336-8.


Monitoring Transepidermal Water Loss and Skin Wettedness Factor with Battery-Free NFC Sensor.

Ali S, Chung W Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(19).

PMID: 32998315 PMC: 7583755. DOI: 10.3390/s20195549.


Subjective wet perception assessment of fabrics with different drying time.

Chau K, Tang K, Kan C R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(8):180798.

PMID: 30225071 PMC: 6124134. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180798.


Human skin wetness perception: psychophysical and neurophysiological bases.

Filingeri D, Havenith G Temperature (Austin). 2016; 2(1):86-104.

PMID: 27227008 PMC: 4843859. DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2015.1008878.


Does the hair influence heat extraction from the head during head cooling under heat stress?.

Shin S, Park J, Lee J Ind Health. 2015; 53(6):533-41.

PMID: 26165361 PMC: 4667044. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2015-0005.


References
1.
Nadel E, Stolwijk J . Effect of skin wettedness on sweat gland response. J Appl Physiol. 1973; 35(5):689-94. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.5.689. View

2.
Tamura T . Development of a two-layer movable sweating thermal manikin. Ind Health. 2006; 44(3):441-4. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.44.441. View

3.
RANDALL W . QUANTITATION AND REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SWEAT GLANDS IN MAN. J Clin Invest. 1946; 25(5):761-7. PMC: 435616. DOI: 10.1172/JCI101760. View

4.
Nadel E, Mitchell J, Stolwijk J . Control of local and total sweating during exercise transients. Int J Biometeorol. 1971; 15(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01803898. View

5.
HERTZMAN A, RANDALL W, PEISS C, SECKENDORF R . Regional rates of evaporation from the skin at various environmental temperatures. J Appl Physiol. 1952; 5(4):153-61. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1952.5.4.153. View