» Articles » PMID: 21373372

Limits of Ultra-Low Dose CT Attenuation Correction for PET/CT

Overview
Date 2011 Sep 28
PMID 21373372
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present an analysis of the effects of ultra-low dose X-ray computerized tomography (CT) based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography (PET). By ultra low dose we mean less than approximately 5 mAs or 0.5 mSv total effective whole body dose. The motivation is the increased interest in using respiratory motion information acquired during the CT scan for both phase-matched CT-based attenuation correction and for motion estimation. Since longer duration CT scans are desired, radiation dose to the patient can be a limiting factor. In this study we evaluate the impact of reducing photon flux rates in the CT data on the reconstructed PET image by using the CATSIM simulation tool for the CT component and the ASIM simulation tool for the PET component. The CT simulation includes effects of the x-ray tube spectra, beam conditioning, bowtie filter, detector noise, and bean hardening correction. The PET simulation includes the effect of attenuation and photon counting. Noise and bias in the PET image were evaluated from multiple realizations of test objects. We show that techniques can be used to significantly reduce the mAs needed for CT based attenuation correction if the CT is not used for diagnostic purposes. The limiting factor, however, is not the noise in the CT image but rather the bias introduced by CT sinogram elements with no detected flux. These results constrain the methods that can be used to lower CT dose in a manner suitable for attenuation correction of PET data. We conclude that ultra-low-dose CT for attenuation correction of PET data is feasible with current PET/CT scanners.

Citing Articles

Ultra-low-dose CT for attenuation correction: dose savings and effect on PET quantification for protocols with and without tin filter.

Bebbington N, Christensen K, Ostergard L, Holdgaard P EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):66.

PMID: 37861887 PMC: 10589162. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00585-0.


Data-driven gated CT: An automated respiratory gating method to enable data-driven gated PET/CT.

Pan T, Thomas M, Luo D Med Phys. 2022; 49(6):3597-3611.

PMID: 35324002 PMC: 9187617. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15620.


Dual energy CT for attenuation correction with PET/CT.

Xia T, Alessio A, Kinahan P Med Phys. 2014; 41(1):012501.

PMID: 24387525 PMC: 3869851. DOI: 10.1118/1.4828838.


Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT.

Xia T, Alessio A, De Man B, Manjeshwar R, Asma E, Kinahan P Phys Med Biol. 2011; 57(2):309-28.

PMID: 22156174 PMC: 3353418. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/2/309.

References
1.
Crotty D, McKinley R, Tornai M . Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(3):603-16. PMC: 3258528. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/005. View

2.
Hamberg L, Rhea J, Hunter G, Thrall J . Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology. 2003; 226(3):762-72. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2263020205. View

3.
Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View

4.
Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchal G, Suetens P . An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(10):999-1008. DOI: 10.1109/42.959297. View

5.
La Riviere P, Bian J, Vargas P . Penalized-likelihood sinogram restoration for computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25(8):1022-36. DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2006.875429. View